Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146602
Title: Response to comments on "reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"
Authors: Moseley, Gina E.
Dublyansky, Yuri V.
Edwards, R. Lawrence
Wendt, Kathleen A.
Pythoud, Mathieu
Zhang, Pu
Cheng, Hai
Lu, Yanbin
Boch, Ronny
Spötl, Christoph
Keywords: Engineering::Environmental engineering
Issue Date: 2016
Source: Moseley, G. E., Dublyansky, Y. V., Edwards, R. L., Wendt, K. A., Pythoud, M., Zhang, P., . . . Spötl, C. (2016). Response to comments on “reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing”. Science, 354(6310), 296e-. doi:10.1126/science.aaf8679
Journal: Science
Abstract: Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, and reiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146602
ISSN: 0036-8075
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8679
Rights: © 2016 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:EOS Journal Articles

Page view(s)

88
Updated on Jan 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.