Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146794
Title: Experimental analysis of powder layer quality as a function of feedstock and recoating strategies
Authors: Le, Tan-Phuc
Wang, Xiaogang
Davidson, Karl Peter
Fronda, Jude Emil
Seita, Matteo
Keywords: Engineering::Materials::Material testing and characterization
Issue Date: 2021
Source: Le, T., Wang, X., Davidson, K. P., Fronda, J. E. & Seita, M. (2021). Experimental analysis of powder layer quality as a function of feedstock and recoating strategies. Additive Manufacturing, 39, 101890-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.101890
Project: NRF-NRFF2018-05 
Journal: Additive Manufacturing 
Abstract: The quality and uniformity of the powder layer have a direct impact on the performance of parts produced via powder bed fusion (PBF). Because powder layer properties depend on many powder- and recoating-specific variables, it is difficult to accurately predict powder bed quality across the variety of PBF processes and powders currently available. In this work, we propose a method to assess powder bed quality as a function of both powder conditions and recoating strategies. Our method relies on the powder bed scanner technology, which provides particle-level resolution images of the entire powder layer as it is recoated. Through numerical analysis of the acquired images, we define three new metrics to assess powder bed quality, namely the powder layer thickness uniformity, surface area roughness, and surface particle density. We demonstrate the efficacy of these metrics in capturing differences in powder layers across a matrix of recoating experiments using different batches of stainless steel 316 L powder. Our results clearly show how powders with different particle surface conditions, morphology, and moisture content respond to various recoating velocities and recoater blade types, resulting in layers with different quality. Owing to the high measurement throughput and versatility, our method offers the opportunity to perform systematic spreadability studies of different powdered materials to optimize PBF processes, as well as provide in situ powder bed quality assessment during part production.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146794
ISSN: 2214-8604
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101890
Schools: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 
School of Materials Science and Engineering 
Research Centres: Singapore Centre for 3D Printing 
Rights: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SC3DP Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2214860421000555-main.pdf14.63 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

56
Updated on Mar 24, 2025

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 10

34
Updated on Oct 26, 2023

Page view(s)

421
Updated on Mar 26, 2025

Download(s) 20

254
Updated on Mar 26, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.