Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/147098
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBohnes, Florence Alexiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLaurent, Alexisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T01:08:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-23T01:08:52Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationBohnes, F. A. & Laurent, A. (2019). LCA of aquaculture systems : methodological issues and potential improvements. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(2), 324-337. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1517-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn0948-3349en_US
dc.identifier.other0000-0002-1431-2684-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/147098-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aquaculture sector is the fastest growing food production industry. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) can be a useful tool to assess its environmental impacts and ensure environmentally sustainable development. Years ago, critical reviews of LCA methodology have been conducted in that field to evaluate methodological practice. However, how effective were these reviews in improving LCA application? Are there any remaining issues that LCA practitioners should address in their practice? Methods: We tackle the above questions by critically reviewing all LCA cases applied to aquaculture and aquafeed production systems from a methodological point of view. A total of 65 studies were retrieved, thus tripling the scope of previous reviews. The studies were analysed following the main phases of the LCA methodology as described in the ISO standards, and the authors’ choices were extracted to identify potential trends in the LCA practice. Results and discussion: We identified five main methodological issues, which still pose challenges to LCA practitioners: (i) the functional unit not always reflecting the actual function of the system, (ii) the system boundary often being too restricted, (iii) the multi-functionality of processes too often being handled with economic allocation while more recommendable ways exist, (iv) the impact coverage not covering all environmental impacts relevant to aquaculture and (v) the interpretation phase usually lacking critical discussion of the methodological limitations. We analysed these aspects in depth, highlighting trends and tendencies. Conclusions: For each of the five remaining issues, we provided recommendations to be integrated by practitioners in their future LCA practice. We also developed a brief research agenda to address the future needs of LCA in the aquaculture sector. The first need is that emphasis should be put on the construction of aquaculture life-cycle inventory databases with a special need for developing countries and for post-farming processes. Additionally, method developers should develop and/or refine characterisation models for missing impact pathways to better cover all relevant impacts of seafood farming.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessmenten_US
dc.rights© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering::Chemical engineeringen_US
dc.titleLCA of aquaculture systems : methodological issues and potential improvementsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Chemical and Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.researchNanyang Technological University Food Technology Centreen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11367-018-1517-x-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85052076252-
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.spage324en_US
dc.identifier.epage337en_US
dc.subject.keywordsAquafeeden_US
dc.subject.keywordsFishen_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:SCBE Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

38
Updated on Mar 17, 2023

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 10

33
Updated on Mar 22, 2023

Page view(s)

176
Updated on Mar 22, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.