Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/148553
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Plasencia, Sam | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-11T02:42:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-11T02:42:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Plasencia, S. (2021). The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable). Studies in Religion and the Enlightenment, 2(2), 22-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/srej.2021.2.2.8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2661-3336 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/148553 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Honorée Fanonne Jeffers’s The Age of Phillis (2020) is the culmination of nearly fif-teen years of research on the eighteenth-century enslaved poetess Phillis Wheatley, who was manumitted in 1773 and married John Peters, a Boston grocer, five years later. In “Looking for Miss Phillis,” the essay that concludes this collection of ninety-nine in-dividually titled poems, Jeffers explains that she wrote this book because she got tired of waiting for someone to write a biography of Wheatley that discussed her “free lineage,” in-cluding the family, customs, and cosmologies that informed her life before enslavement.1 All existing biographies, including Vincent Carretta’s carefully researched Phillis Wheatley: Bi-ography of a Genius in Bondage (2011), begin their treatment of Wheatley “at the Boston Harbor in 1761, with her disembarking a slave ship” (174). And what of her marriage to John Peters? Jeffers asks why literary historians “have entrusted the story of Phillis Wheatley and John Peters to a white woman [Margaretta Matilda Odell] who may have made assumptions about Wheatley’s husband, assumptions that might not just be wrong, but also the product of racial stereotypes” (173). What if Wheatley wasn’t a “sycophant” (180)? What if John Peters wasn’t a “hustler” who abused and then abandoned Wheatley (180)? The extant archives do not support these depictions of Wheatley or Peters, and the only evidence of Odell’s authorial claim to being a “collateral descendant” of the white Wheatleys is her claim itself. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Studies in Religion and the Enlightenment | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2021 Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, & the Brigham Young University Faculty Publishing Service. | en_US |
dc.subject | Humanities::Literature::English | en_US |
dc.title | The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable) | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.contributor.school | School of Humanities | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.32655/srej.2021.2.2.8 | - |
dc.description.version | Published version | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 22 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 26 | en_US |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | Studies in Religion and the Enlightenment |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Plasencia Final2.pdf | 221.51 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
404
Updated on Sep 11, 2024
Download(s) 50
135
Updated on Sep 11, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.