Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/148553
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPlasencia, Samen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T02:42:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-11T02:42:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationPlasencia, S. (2021). The Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable). Studies in Religion and the Enlightenment, 2(2), 22-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/srej.2021.2.2.8en_US
dc.identifier.issn2661-3336en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/148553-
dc.description.abstractHonorée Fanonne Jeffers’s The Age of Phillis (2020) is the culmination of nearly fif-teen years of research on the eighteenth-century enslaved poetess Phillis Wheatley, who was manumitted in 1773 and married John Peters, a Boston grocer, five years later. In “Looking for Miss Phillis,” the essay that concludes this collection of ninety-nine in-dividually titled poems, Jeffers explains that she wrote this book because she got tired of waiting for someone to write a biography of Wheatley that discussed her “free lineage,” in-cluding the family, customs, and cosmologies that informed her life before enslavement.1 All existing biographies, including Vincent Carretta’s carefully researched Phillis Wheatley: Bi-ography of a Genius in Bondage (2011), begin their treatment of Wheatley “at the Boston Harbor in 1761, with her disembarking a slave ship” (174). And what of her marriage to John Peters? Jeffers asks why literary historians “have entrusted the story of Phillis Wheatley and John Peters to a white woman [Margaretta Matilda Odell] who may have made assumptions about Wheatley’s husband, assumptions that might not just be wrong, but also the product of racial stereotypes” (173). What if Wheatley wasn’t a “sycophant” (180)? What if John Peters wasn’t a “hustler” who abused and then abandoned Wheatley (180)? The extant archives do not support these depictions of Wheatley or Peters, and the only evidence of Odell’s authorial claim to being a “collateral descendant” of the white Wheatleys is her claim itself.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofStudies in Religion and the Enlightenmenten_US
dc.rights© 2021 Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, & the Brigham Young University Faculty Publishing Service.en_US
dc.subjectHumanities::Literature::Englishen_US
dc.titleThe Black Radical Tradition in The Age of Phillis — The Age of Phillis (Roundtable)en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanitiesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.32655/srej.2021.2.2.8-
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.identifier.spage22en_US
dc.identifier.epage26en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Studies in Religion and the Enlightenment
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1 Plasencia Final2.pdf221.51 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s)

404
Updated on Sep 11, 2024

Download(s) 50

135
Updated on Sep 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.