Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Electoral secularism in Singapore : political responses to homosexuality||Authors:||Walid Jumblatt Abdullah||Keywords:||Social sciences::Political science||Issue Date:||2019||Source:||Walid Jumblatt Abdullah (2019). Electoral secularism in Singapore : political responses to homosexuality. Asian Studies Review, 43(2), 239-255. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1593945||Journal:||Asian Studies Review||Abstract:||In recent years, the interventionist self-avowed secular state of Singapore, like many non-Western countries, has had to wrestle with the issue of homosexuality and Lesbian, Gay, Transsexual and Bisexual (LGBT) rights. Managing the demands of the conservative elements of society alongside the increasingly vocal liberal factions is a priority for a state whose legitimacy depends, in large part, on maintaining social order. This article makes the following argument. Contrary to what has been suggested by some commentators, the Singaporean state does not have an ideological preference in this matter. As such, it is willing to pander to both the liberal and conservative segments of society, and does so by retaining the anti-homosexuality law (known colloquially as §377A) while promising not to enforce it. This is what I term “electoral secularism”: in cases involving religion whereby the state has no firm predisposition, it attempts to adopt a position that is likely to please as many of its citizens as it can, or at least one that will antagonise as few as possible. The concept of electoral secularism is antithetical to the notion that secularism necessarily and always entails a principled stance of separation between church and state.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/148739||ISSN:||1035-7823||DOI:||10.1080/10357823.2019.1593945||Rights:||© 2019 Asian Studies Association of Australia. All rights reserved.||Fulltext Permission:||none||Fulltext Availability:||No Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SSS Journal Articles|
Updated on Nov 19, 2022
Web of ScienceTM
Updated on Nov 24, 2022
Updated on Nov 25, 2022
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.