Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Psychometric testing of the Fall Risks for Older People in the Community screening tool (FROP-Com screen) for community-dwelling people with stroke
Authors: Ng, Shamay S. M.
Liu, Tai-Wa
Kwong, Patrick W. H.
Choy, Ho-Man
Fong, Terence Y. K
Lee, Justine Y. C.
Tan, Yi-Li
Tong, Gary Y. H.
Wong, Crystal C. Y.
Lai, Cynthia Y. Y.
Tse, Mimi M. Y.
Keywords: Science::Medicine
Issue Date: 2020
Source: Ng, S. S. M., Liu, T., Kwong, P. W. H., Choy, H., Fong, T. Y. K., Lee, J. Y. C., Tan, Y., Tong, G. Y. H., Wong, C. C. Y., Lai, C. Y. Y. & Tse, M. M. Y. (2020). Psychometric testing of the Fall Risks for Older People in the Community screening tool (FROP-Com screen) for community-dwelling people with stroke. PloS One, 15(5).
Journal: PloS One 
Abstract: Objective: The Falls Risk for Older People in the Community assessment (FROP-Com) was originally developed using 13 risk factors to identify the fall risks of community-dwelling older people. To suit the practical use in busy clinical settings, a brief version adopting 3 most fall predictive risk factors from the original FROP-Com, including the number of falls in the past 12 months, assistance required to perform domestic activities of daily living and observation of balance, was developed for screening purpose (FROP-Com screen). The objectives of this study were to investigate the inter-rater and test-retest reliability, concurrent and convergent validity, and minimum detectable change of the FROP-Com screen in community-dwelling people with stroke. Participants: Community-dwelling people with stroke (n = 48) were recruited from a local self-help group, and community-dwelling older people (n = 40) were recruited as control subjects. Results: The FROP-Com screen exhibited moderate inter-rater (Intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]2,1 = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65–0.87) and test-retest reliability (ICC3,1 = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.46–0.83) and weak associations with two balance measures, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (rho = -0.38, p = 0.008) and the Timed “Up & Go” (TUG) test (rho = 0.35, p = 0.016). The screen also exhibited a moderate association with the Chinese version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-C) (ABC-C; rho = -0.65, p<0.001), a measure of subjective balance confidence. Conclusions: The FROP-Com screen is a reliable clinical tool with convergent validity paralleled with subjective balance confidence measure that can be used in fall risk screening of community dwelling people with stroke. However, one individual item, the observation of balance, will require additional refinement to improve the potential measurement error.
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233045
Research Centres: Rehabilitation Research Institute of Singapore (RRIS) 
Rights: © 2020 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:LKCMedicine Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pone.0233045.pdf384.57 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Citations 50

Updated on Jun 19, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 50

Updated on Oct 31, 2023

Page view(s)

Updated on Jun 20, 2024

Download(s) 50

Updated on Jun 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.