Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/15006
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Hao Chieh. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kuik, Zoe Soo Hsien. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Hwa Jiat. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-03-19T03:37:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-03-19T03:37:46Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/15006 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Since its introduction in 1969, the q ratio has been used to explain a wide variety of phenomena. It has increasingly been used as a financial-market measure of firm’s performance, and also a measure of a firm’s intangible value. In this paper, we use Tobin’s q as a financial market-based measure of firm performance and examine the association between firm performance and stock market valuation of equities, plus 2 factors: book-to-market equity and size, which according to Fama and French [1992], explain the variation of cross section expected returns. We also controlled for firm-specific and macroeconomic variables. The results based on data from 1995-2007, of 25 listed corporations in the Singapore market, indicate that the inclusion of the 3 factors and industrial dummies increased the variance explained in q significantly. Stock price performance and size have significantly positive association with q ratio; book-to-market equity has an inverse association. The results also show that firms in industries with average q more than 1 have a premium in performance and valuation relative to those firms in industries with average q equal or less than 1. We also substituted Tobin’s q for book-to-market equity as one of the factors that proxy for exposure to systematic risk to examine if this ratio has a relatively stronger association with an asset’s returns. The other factors included are market return and size, and we controlled for macroeconomic-wide variables. The results indicate a negative association between asset returns and book-to-market equity; and a positive one between asset returns and q ratio. The results show that after controlling for macroeconomic variables and size, market return and q ratio are the only 2 significant factors in predicting security returns; and that q ratio is a more superior factor in explaining security returns. In fact, the results also indicate those firms with high q commands a premium in security returns relative to firms with low q ratio. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 42 p. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic theory::Macroeconomics | en_US |
dc.title | Tobin’s Q as a market-based measure of firm’s performance and as a proxy for exposure to systematic risk. | en_US |
dc.type | Final Year Project (FYP) | en_US |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Zhou Jie | en_US |
dc.contributor.school | School of Humanities and Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Bachelor of Arts | en_US |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
H03.pdf.pdf Restricted Access | 474.24 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.