Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/150169
Title: Group greedy method for sensor placement
Authors: Jiang, Chaoyang
Chen, Zhenghua
Su, Rong
Soh, Yeng Chai
Keywords: Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
Issue Date: 2019
Source: Jiang, C., Chen, Z., Su, R. & Soh, Y. C. (2019). Group greedy method for sensor placement. IEEE Transactions On Signal Processing, 67(9), 2249-2262. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2019.2903017
Project: NRF2015ENC-GBICRD001-057
NRF-CRP8-2011-03
A1788a0023
Journal: IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Abstract: This paper discusses greedy methods for sensor placement in linear inverse problems. We comprehensively review the greedy methods in the sense of optimizing the mean squared error (MSE), the volume of the confidence ellipsoid, and the worst-case error variance. We show that the greedy method of optimizing an MSE related cost function can find a near-optimal solution. We then provide a new fast algorithm to optimize the MSE. In greedy methods, we select the sensing location one by one. In this way, the searching space is greatly reduced but many valid solutions are ignored. To further improve the current greedy methods, we propose a group-greedy strategy, which can be applied to optimize all the three criteria. In each step, we reserve a group of suboptimal sensor configurations which are used to generate the potential sensor configurations of the next step and the best one is used to check the terminal condition. Compared with the current greedy methods, the group-greedy strategy increases the searching space but greatly improve the solution performance. We find the necessary and sufficient conditions that the current greedy methods and the proposed group greedy method can obtain the optimal solution. The illustrative examples show that the group greedy method outperforms the corresponding greedy method. We also provide a practical way to find a proper group size with which the proposed group greedy method can find a solution that has almost the same performance as the optimal solution.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/150169
ISSN: 1053-587X
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2019.2903017
Rights: © 2019 IEEE. All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:EEE Journal Articles

Page view(s)

71
Updated on Dec 2, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.