Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/150191
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Boen_US
dc.contributor.authorSun, Tianjunen_US
dc.contributor.authorDrasgow, Fritzen_US
dc.contributor.authorChernyshenko, Oleksandr S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNye, Christopher D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStark, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Leonard A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-09T04:04:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-09T04:04:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationZhang, B., Sun, T., Drasgow, F., Chernyshenko, O. S., Nye, C. D., Stark, S. & White, L. A. (2020). Though forced, still valid : psychometric equivalence of forced-choice and single-statement measures. Organizational Research Methods, 23(3), 569-590. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428119836486en_US
dc.identifier.issn1094-4281en_US
dc.identifier.other0000-0002-6730-7336-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/150191-
dc.description.abstractForced-choice (FC) measures are gaining popularity as an alternative assessment format to single-statement (SS) measures. However, a fundamental question remains to be answered: Do FC and SS instruments measure the same underlying constructs? In addition, FC measures are theorized to be more cognitively challenging, so how would this feature influence respondents’ reactions to FC measures compared to SS? We used both between- and within-subjects designs to examine the equivalence of the FC format and the SS format. As the results illustrate, FC measures scored by the multi-unidimensional pairwise preference (MUPP) model and SS measures scored with the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM) showed strong equivalence. Specifically, both formats demonstrated similar marginal reliabilities and test-retest reliabilities, high convergent validities, good discriminant validities, and similar criterion-related validities with theoretically relevant criteria. In addition, the formats had little differential impact on respondents’ general emotional and cognitive reactions except that the FC format was perceived to be slightly more difficult and more time-saving.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOrganizational Research Methodsen_US
dc.rights© 2019 The Author(s). All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectSocial sciences::Psychologyen_US
dc.titleThough forced, still valid : psychometric equivalence of forced-choice and single-statement measuresen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolCollege of Business (Nanyang Business School)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1094428119836486-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85064047034-
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.spage569en_US
dc.identifier.epage590en_US
dc.subject.keywordsForced-choiceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSingle-statementen_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:NBS Journal Articles

Page view(s)

121
Updated on Jan 22, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.