Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/150617
Title: Surface roughness as a comparator for natural teak alternatives
Authors: Chen, Alethea Mei Yun
Keywords: Engineering::Materials::Testing of materials
Engineering::Mechanical engineering
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: Nanyang Technological University
Source: Chen, A. M. Y. (2021). Surface roughness as a comparator for natural teak alternatives. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/150617
Abstract: This study is about wood used for furniture. Natural teak has been a top choice for furniture makers due to its high strength and durability. However, its declining sustainability has generated the need for potential alternatives such as plantation teak, iroko and balau. While these woods may have comparable strength with natural teak, not much has been analysed about their surface roughness. This is important in determining their surface finish and durability as a piece of furniture. Hence, the objective of this study is to measure and compare the surface roughness of natural teak, plantation teak, iroko and balau based on these four parameters – arithmetic mean roughness, root-mean-square roughness, skewness and kurtosis. Based on the results, natural teak does possess a generally smooth surface with high durability. Its best alternative, based on the closeness and desirability of results, is balau. The surface profile of plantation teak has shown to be the most valley-based, which is ideal for coating and lubricating furniture. Iroko, on the other hand, has the roundest profile that makes it extremely durable due to lower levels of stress.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/150617
Fulltext Permission: restricted
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:MAE Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Final Report for Submission.pdf
  Restricted Access
449.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

73
Updated on Jan 20, 2022

Download(s)

4
Updated on Jan 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.