Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/150796
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarsoof, Althafen_US
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Indranathen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-28T08:08:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-28T08:08:33Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationMarsoof, A. & Gupta, I. (2019). Shielding internet intermediaries from copyright liability - a comparative discourse on safe harbours in Singapore and India. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 22(3-4), 234-270. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12126en_US
dc.identifier.issn1422-2213en_US
dc.identifier.other0000-0002-3658-5229-
dc.identifier.other0000-0002-6262-4885-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/150796-
dc.description.abstractWithout intermediaries that provide access to, host and link content, the internet will not be the vibrant place it is today. Yet with the rising number of online copyright infringements, right holders have increasingly shifted their focus to intermediaries in their efforts to curb infringements. This has led to internet intermediaries being increasingly exposed to copyright liability. In light of this, safe harbours that provide certain classes of intermediaries with conditional immunity play an important role in maintaining a healthy balance between the interests of right holders and third parties. In the copyright context, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998 (DMCA) enacted in the United States was the first instance where such a safe harbour was afforded to internet intermediaries. During the two decades of the DMCA's operation, it has been used as a blueprint to shape safe harbours in other jurisdictions. This article focusses on two such jurisdictions—namely, Singapore and India—and provides a comparative and in-depth analysis of the safe harbour frameworks in the said jurisdictions, while mapping out how they compare with the DMCA. In the process, the article highlights a number of features in the DMCA that have been remodelled in Singapore and India.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNanyang Technological Universityen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of World Intellectual Propertyen_US
dc.rights© 2019 The Authors. All rights reserved. This paper was published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd in Journal of World Intellectual Property and is made available with permission of The Authors.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness::International businessen_US
dc.titleShielding internet intermediaries from copyright liability - a comparative discourse on safe harbours in Singapore and Indiaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolCollege of Business (Nanyang Business School)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jwip.12126-
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068503942-
dc.identifier.issue3-4en_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.spage234en_US
dc.identifier.epage270en_US
dc.subject.keywordsDigital Millennium Copyright Act 1998en_US
dc.subject.keywordsInternet Intermediariesen_US
dc.description.acknowledgementThe authors acknowledge the research assistance provided by Mr Deepesh Jain, who, at the time, was a researchassistant attached to the JGLS. This paper is an outcome of a research project that was funded by the first author’s start‐up research grant.en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:NBS Journal Articles

Page view(s)

192
Updated on May 19, 2022

Download(s) 20

144
Updated on May 19, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.