Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Mind your meat : religious differences in the social perception of animals
Authors: Manokara, Kunalan
Lee, Albert
Kamble, Shanmukh V.
Krumhuber, Eva G.
Keywords: Social sciences::Psychology
Issue Date: 2020
Source: Manokara, K., Lee, A., Kamble, S. V. & Krumhuber, E. G. (2020). Mind your meat : religious differences in the social perception of animals. International Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 466-477.
Journal: International Journal of Psychology
Abstract: While previous work demonstrated that animals are categorised based on their edibility, little research has systematically evaluated the role of religion in the perception of animal edibility, particularly when specific animals are deemed sacred in a religion. In two studies, we explored a key psychological mechanism through which sacred animals are deemed inedible by members of a faith: mind attribution. In Study 1, non-vegetarian Hindus in Singapore (N = 70) evaluated 19 animals that differed in terms of their sacredness and edibility. Results showed that participants categorised animals into three groups: holy animals (high sacredness but low edibility), food animals (low sacredness but high edibility) and neutral animals (low sacredness and low edibility). Holy animals were deemed to possess greater mental life compared to other animal categories. In Study 2, we replicated this key finding with Hindus in India (N = 100), and further demonstrated that the observed pattern of results was specific to Hindus but not Muslims (N = 90). In both studies, mind attribution mediated the negative association between sacredness and edibility. Our findings illustrate how religious groups diverge in animal perception, thereby highlighting the role of mind attribution as a crucial link between sacredness and edibility.
ISSN: 1464-066X
DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12717
Rights: © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Union of Psychological Science. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SSS Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mind your meat Religious differences in the social perception of animals.pdf822.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

Updated on Jan 19, 2022


Updated on Jan 19, 2022

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.