Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/15174
Title: An empirical comparison of the bachelier and the black-scholes call option pricing models.
Authors: Kok, Wen Ya.
Tan, Gek Eng.
Zheng, Xin.
Keywords: DRNTU::Business::Finance::Options
Issue Date: 2009
Abstract: The Black-Scholes formula is a recognized model for pricing and hedging derivative securities. It relies, however, on several highly questionable assumptions. This report examines whether the Bachelier’s option pricing model can be used to find the European call option prices corresponding to the market prices better than the Black-Scholes option pricing model when the historical volatility is used. Both the Black-Scholes and the Bachelier’s models are applied to the at-the-money and in-the-money options of the AMEX and the CBOE Indexes European call options in the year 2005. As a benchmark, the Black-Scholes model with historical volatility estimates is used. Comparisons reveal that the Bachelier’s option pricing model outperforms the benchmark and exhibits higher precision than the Black-Scholes formula in pricing options, be it shorter or longer term options. Both models exhibit greater accuracy for options with shorter time to maturity and greater degree of moneyness.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10356/15174
Rights: Nanyang Technological University
Fulltext Permission: restricted
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:NBS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
KokWenYa09.pdf
  Restricted Access
467.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 20

345
checked on Sep 27, 2020

Download(s) 20

10
checked on Sep 27, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.