Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/151786
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMak, David Siu Keien_US
dc.contributor.authorAccoto, Dinoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-16T10:57:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-16T10:57:36Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationMak, D. S. K. & Accoto, D. (2021). Review of current spinal robotic orthoses. Healthcare, 9(1), 70-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010070en_US
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/151786-
dc.description.abstractOsteoporotic spine fractures (OSF) are common sequelae of osteoporosis. OSF are directly correlated with increasing age and incidence of osteoporosis. OSF are treated conservatively or surgically. Associated acute pain, chronic disabilities, and progressive deformities are well documented. Conservative measures include a combination of initial bed rest, analgesia, early physiotherapy, and a spinal brace (orthosis), with the aim for early rehabilitation to prevent complications of immobile state. Spinal bracing is commonly used for symptomatic management of OSF. While traditional spinal braces aim to maintain the neutral spinal alignment and reduce the axial loading on the fractured vertebrae, they are well known for complications including discomfort with reduced compliance, atrophy of paraspinal muscles, and restriction of chest expansion leading to chest infections. Exoskeletons have been developed to passively assist and actively augment human movements with different types of actuators. Flexible, versatile spinal exoskeletons are designed to better support the spine. As new technologies enable the development of motorized wearable exoskeletons, several types have been introduced into the medical field application. We have provided a thorough review of the current spinal robotic technologies in this paper. The shortcomings in the current spinal exoskeletons were identified. Their limitations on the use for patients with OSF with potential improvement strategies were discussed. With our current knowledge of spinal orthosis for conservatively managed OSF, a semi-rigid backpack style thoracolumbar spinal robotic orthosis will reduce spinal bone stress and improve back muscle support. This will lead to back pain reduction, improved posture, and overall mobility. Early mobilization is an important part of management of patients with OSF as it reduces the chance of developing complications related to their immobile state for patients with OSF, which will be helpful for their recovery.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHealthcareen_US
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectEngineering::Mechanical engineeringen_US
dc.titleReview of current spinal robotic orthosesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare9010070-
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.identifier.pmid33451142-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104344351-
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.spage70en_US
dc.subject.keywordsOsteoporotic Spine Fractureen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSpinal Orthosisen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:MAE Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
healthcare-09-00070-v2.pdf5.91 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

11
Updated on Apr 25, 2025

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 50

1
Updated on Oct 27, 2023

Page view(s)

363
Updated on Apr 26, 2025

Download(s) 50

128
Updated on Apr 26, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.