Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/152222
Title: | Perceptions of meritocracy in Singapore : inconsistencies, contestations and biases | Authors: | Teo, Terri-Anne | Keywords: | Social sciences::Sociology | Issue Date: | 2019 | Source: | Teo, T. (2019). Perceptions of meritocracy in Singapore : inconsistencies, contestations and biases. Asian Studies Review, 43(2), 184-205. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1587592 | Journal: | Asian Studies Review | Abstract: | This article questions how meritocracy, as a state-sponsored narrative in Singapore, is variously negotiated and interpreted by Singaporean youth. Conveyed as a tenet central to Singapore’s national identity, meritocracy is often referred to as the “Singapore Dream” where socioeconomic mobility is made possible through hard work and ability regardless of ethnic difference. Critics of meritocracy in Singapore problematise how the narrative exists as a political instrument, conceals systemic discrimination and perpetuates ethnic inequality. Yet, how the population receives meritocracy remains unexplored within scholarship. While recognising its dominance within Singapore’s socio-political landscape, this article takes a bottom-up approach to understanding how meritocracy is perceived on the ground. Interviews conducted with Singaporean polytechnic students reveal differential experiences and articulations of meritocracy, demonstrating a gap between the endorsement of meritocracy as a positive value and conviction that it exists in practice. Furthermore, where ethnic discrimination is recognised among Singaporean youth, it is oftentimes normalised as a function of a multiracial society. This belief is problematic as it vindicates state and society and reduces the impetus to seek redress and change. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/152222 | ISSN: | 1035-7823 | DOI: | 10.1080/10357823.2019.1587592 | Schools: | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies | Rights: | © 2019 Asian Studies Association of Australia. All rights reserved. | Fulltext Permission: | none | Fulltext Availability: | No Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | RSIS Journal Articles |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
20
18
Updated on Sep 17, 2024
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
20
14
Updated on Oct 27, 2023
Page view(s) 10
872
Updated on Sep 17, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.