Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153002
Title: How rainfall influences tephra fall loading — an experimental approach
Authors: Williams, George T.
Jenkins, Susanna F.
Lee, Daniel W. J.
Wee, Shi Jun
Keywords: Science::Geology
Issue Date: 2021
Source: Williams, G. T., Jenkins, S. F., Lee, D. W. J. & Wee, S. J. (2021). How rainfall influences tephra fall loading — an experimental approach. Bulletin of Volcanology, 83(6), 42-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-021-01465-0
Journal: Bulletin of Volcanology 
Abstract: The load a tephra fall deposit applies to an underlying surface is a key factor controlling its potential to damage a wide range of assets including buildings, trees, crops and powerlines. Though it has long been recognised that loading can increase when deposits absorb rainfall, few efforts have been made to quantify likely load increases. This study builds on previous theoretical work, using an experimental approach to quantify change in load as a function of grainsize distribution, rainfall intensity and duration. A total of 20 laboratory experiments were carried out for ~ 10-cm thick, dry tephra deposits of varying grainsize and grading, taken to represent different eruptive scenarios (e.g. stable, waxing or waning plume). Tephra was deposited onto a 15° impermeable slope (representing a low pitch roof) and exposed to simulated heavy rainfalls of 35 and 70 mm h−1 for durations of up to 2 h. Across all experiments, the maximum load increases ranged from 18 to 30%. Larger increases occurred in fine-grained to medium-grained deposits or in inversely graded deposits, as these retained water more efficiently. The lowest increases occurred in normally graded deposits as rain was unable to infiltrate to the deposit’s base. In deposits composed entirely of coarse tephra, high drainage rates meant the amount of water absorbed was controlled by the deposit’s capillary porosity, rather than its total porosity, resulting in load increases that were smaller than expected. These results suggest that, for low pitch roofs, the maximum deposit load increase due to rainfall is around 30%, significantly lower than the oft-referenced 100%. To complement our experimental results, field measurements of tephra thickness should be supplemented with tephra loading measurements, wherever possible, especially when measurements are made at or near the site of observed damage.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/153002
ISSN: 0258-8900
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-021-01465-0
DOI (Related Dataset): 10.21979/N9/48FOZP
Schools: Asian School of the Environment 
Research Centres: Earth Observatory of Singapore 
Rights: © 2021 The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:ASE Journal Articles
EOS Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Williams2021_Article_HowRainfallInfluencesTephraFal.pdf2 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

13
Updated on Mar 19, 2025

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 50

3
Updated on Oct 22, 2023

Page view(s)

246
Updated on Mar 21, 2025

Download(s) 50

78
Updated on Mar 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.