Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Functional classification of super-large families of enzymes based on substrate binding pocket residues for biocatalysis and enzyme engineering applications||Authors:||Sirota, Fernanda L.
|Keywords:||Science::Biological sciences||Issue Date:||2021||Source:||Sirota, F. L., Maurer-Stroh, S., Li, Z., Eisenhaber, F. & Eisenhaber, B. (2021). Functional classification of super-large families of enzymes based on substrate binding pocket residues for biocatalysis and enzyme engineering applications. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9, 701120-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.701120||Project:||NRF-CRP17-2017-03||Journal:||Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology||Abstract:||Large enzyme families such as the groups of zinc-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs), long chain alcohol oxidases (AOxs) or amine dehydrogenases (AmDHs) with, sometimes, more than one million sequences in the non-redundant protein database and hundreds of experimentally characterized enzymes are excellent cases for protein engineering efforts aimed at refining and modifying substrate specificity. Yet, the backside of this wealth of information is that it becomes technically difficult to rationally select optimal sequence targets as well as sequence positions for mutagenesis studies. In all three cases, we approach the problem by starting with a group of experimentally well studied family members (including those with available 3D structures) and creating a structure-guided multiple sequence alignment and a modified phylogenetic tree (aka binding site tree) based just on a selection of potential substrate binding residue positions derived from experimental information (not from the full-length sequence alignment). Hereupon, the remaining, mostly uncharacterized enzyme sequences can be mapped; as a trend, sequence grouping in the tree branches follows substrate specificity. We show that this information can be used in the target selection for protein engineering work to narrow down to single suitable sequences and just a few relevant candidate positions for directed evolution towards activity for desired organic compound substrates. We also demonstrate how to find the closest thermophile example in the dataset if the engineering is aimed at achieving most robust enzymes.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154026||ISSN:||2296-4185||DOI:||10.3389/fbioe.2021.701120||Schools:||School of Biological Sciences||Organisations:||Bioinformatics Institute, A*STAR
Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR
|Rights:||© 2021 Sirota, Maurer-Stroh, Li, Eisenhaber and Eisenhaber. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SBS Journal Articles|
Files in This Item:
|fbioe-09-701120.pdf||4.85 MB||Adobe PDF|
Updated on Jun 2, 2023
Updated on Jun 10, 2023
Updated on Jun 10, 2023
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.