Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Relevance judgment when browsing a health discussion forum : content analysis of eye fixations||Authors:||Pian, Wenjing
Khoo, Christopher S.G.
|Keywords:||Library and information science||Issue Date:||2014||Source:||Pian, W., Khoo, C. S. & Chang, Y. (2014). Relevance judgment when browsing a health discussion forum : content analysis of eye fixations. Library and Information Science Research E-Journal, 24(2), 132-147. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LIBRES.2014.2.6||Journal:||Library and Information Science Research E-Journal||Abstract:||Introduction. People are increasingly searching and browsing for health information on social media sites. This is a small study of the relevance criteria used by laypersons when browsing a health discussion forum under three conditions—when seeking information for their own health issue, for a friend’s or relative’s health issue, and with no particular issue in mind. Methods. An eye-tracker system was used to identify what text users’ eyes were fixated on when browsing post surrogates and post content on a health discussion forum. Eye-fixations indicated the text segments that the user’s attention was focused on when making relevance judgments. Content analysis was performed on the text segments with eye-fixation, to identify the types of information they contain. These types of information are considered to be the direct relevance criteria used. Results. Users seeking information for their own health issue focused on case-based information: the poster’s symptom and history of disease, demographic information, and feelings about the symptom. They also focused on descriptions of disease and treatments. Participants seeking for other people’s health issue focused on factual information: terminology, etiology and description of disease, and description of treatments. Participants browsing with no particular issue focused on topics of general interest such as smoking, and rare or unusual issues. Conclusion. While the relevance criteria of topicality, accuracy, currency and authority are not unimportant, they are not upper-most in the minds of users when assessing information content.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154278||ISSN:||1058-6768||DOI:||10.32655/LIBRES.2014.2.6||Rights:||© 2014 Wenjing Pian, Christopher S.G. Khoo, Yun-Ke Chang. All rights reserved.||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||Library and Information Science Research E-journal (LIBRES)|
Updated on Jan 22, 2022
Updated on Jan 22, 2022
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.