Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/154305
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBudd, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Kristine N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-17T01:27:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-17T01:27:26Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationBudd, J. M. & Stewart, K. N. (2015). Is there such a thing as “Least Publishable Unit”? An empirical investigation. Library and Information Science Research E-Journal, 25(2), 78-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LIBRES.2015.2.1en_US
dc.identifier.issn1058-6768en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/154305-
dc.description.abstractObjective. Scientists are afflicted by what has been anecdotally referred to as the phenomenon of “Least Publishable Unit” (LPU). This project is an effort at empirical analysis of the phenomenon. Method. Three months of the journals JAMA and the New England Journal of Medicine were analyzed to identify work that has been funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Next, the database Medline was searched to discover the total number of publications by each researcher and the publications that acknowledge the single specified funding source (the grant mentioned in the journals). Results. Biomedical researchers who published in JAMA and the New England Journal of Medicine were found to have a substantial number of publications from 2010 through 2013. Those publications are indicative of a huge literature that has to be searched in order to find work relevant to information seekers’ needs. Moreover, each researcher has several publications stemming from work funded by a single NIH grant. Contribution. The implications of this research for libraries are primarily the explosion of content and the potential duplication of publications.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLibrary and Information Science Research E-Journalen_US
dc.rights© 2016 John M. Budd, Kristine N. Stewart. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectLibrary and information scienceen_US
dc.titleIs there such a thing as “Least Publishable Unit”? An empirical investigationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.32655/LIBRES.2015.2.1-
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.spage78en_US
dc.identifier.epage85en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Library and Information Science Research E-journal (LIBRES)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LIBRESv25i2p78-85.BuddStewart.2015.pdf114.1 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s)

28
Updated on Jul 2, 2022

Download(s)

13
Updated on Jul 2, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.