Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155028
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKam, Stefanieen_US
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-23T05:55:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-23T05:55:36Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationKam, S. & Clarke, M. (2021). Securitization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiang. International Affairs, 97(3), 625-642. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab038en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-5850en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/155028-
dc.description.abstractPrevious explanations on China's counterterrorism strategy have highlighted the results of China's strategy of repression in Xinjiang, the historical antecedents and institutional foundations of its counterterrorism policies, as well as international and domestic sources of China's counterterrorism strategy. While acknowledging the importance of all these dimensions, this article draws attention to a largely neglected feature of China's counterterrorism strategy: the Chinese party-state's social engineering of Xinjiang. Building on Maoist-era practices such as the mass line and the ‘friend vs. enemy’ binary, the Communist party under Xi Jinping has integrated surveillance technologies as part of its strategy of preventive counterterrorism and ‘de-extremization’. This article argues that the Chinese party-state's embrace of modern technologies, a weak liberal tradition in China, Xi Jinping's rise to power in late 2012, and the appointment of Chen Quanguo as Xinjiang's party-secretary in 2016, provides the socio-political background for the intensification of securitization, surveillance and introduction of ‘re-education and training centres’ in Xinjiang. Surveillance technologies now complement collective, face-to-face methods of surveillance and Maoist-era techniques of mass mobilization, enabling the Chinese party-state to govern and manage the biopolitical spaces of Uyghurs with greater intensity, according to the state's precise norms. The legalization and institutionalization of ‘de-extremization’ has also led to the shift from mass ‘de-extremization’ propaganda to ‘drip-irrigation’ ideological and political re-education of individuals deemed at risk of extremism. The result is an increased capacity by the Chinese party-state to surveil and control the region, and to more effectively negate the possibility of individual resistance.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Affairsen_US
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of International Affairs. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectSocial sciences::Political science::International relationsen_US
dc.titleSecuritization, surveillance and 'de-extremization' in Xinjiangen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ia/iiab038-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85107537946-
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.volume97en_US
dc.identifier.spage625en_US
dc.identifier.epage642en_US
dc.subject.keywordsChinaen_US
dc.subject.keywordsChinese Politicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCounterterrorismen_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

15
Updated on Apr 20, 2025

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 50

2
Updated on Oct 26, 2023

Page view(s)

168
Updated on Apr 26, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.