Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/155782
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWelté, Jean-Baptisteen_US
dc.contributor.authorCayla, Julienen_US
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Eileenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-12T05:59:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-12T05:59:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationWelté, J., Cayla, J. & Fischer, E. (2021). Navigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailing. Journal of Retailing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.11.002en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4359en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/155782-
dc.description.abstractWhen designing luxury retail experiences, luxury managers are often encouraged to focus on a single logic: the logic of distinction. Evidence suggests, however, that multiple logics influence the field of luxury retailing. In this paper, we explore the implications of such multiplicity, focusing particularly on logics coming into tension with one another. Our research questions are: 1) What are the logics that come into conflict in luxury retail settings and 2) How can luxury retail managers navigate conflicts between logics to facilitate positive customer experiences in luxury retail settings? Based on extensive ethnographic fieldwork in the luxury field, we find conflicts mainly between three logics: distinction, pragmatism, and hedonism. We show that each logic is underpinned by different values, different linguistic practices, and different focal objects. We further find that conflicts between the logics tend to become acute during specific interactions during the customer journey. Our findings also suggest that since luxury boutiques are by and large designed to enforce the distinction logic, luxury retailers at times struggle to accommodate and navigate the conflicts that occur between these logics. We identify three interrelated sets of practices, collectively referred to as experiential hybridization, that effectively allow luxury retailers to address the challenge of logic complexity. Theoretically, our research helps illuminate institutional logics as a factor that informs customers’ experiences in contemporary retail fields such as luxury. Managerially, we suggest ways for luxury retailers to manage logic conflict and deliver superior customer experiences.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNanyang Technological Universityen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Retailingen_US
dc.rights© 2021 New York University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness::Marketingen_US
dc.titleNavigating contradictory logics in the field of luxury retailingen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolCollege of Business (Nanyang Business School)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jretai.2021.11.002-
dc.subject.keywordsCustomer Experienceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsInstitutional Logicsen_US
dc.description.acknowledgementWe acknowledge the financial support of Nanyang Technological University in funding data collection for this research.en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:NBS Journal Articles

Page view(s)

32
Updated on Jun 27, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.