Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/157193
Title: | Influence of 3D earth structure on glacial isostatic adjustment in the Russian Arctic | Authors: | Li, Tanghua Khan, Nicole S. Baranskaya, Alisa V. Shaw, Timothy Adam Peltier, W. Richard Stuhne, Gordan R. Wu, Patrick Horton, Benjamin Peter |
Keywords: | Science::Geology | Issue Date: | 2022 | Source: | Li, T., Khan, N. S., Baranskaya, A. V., Shaw, T. A., Peltier, W. R., Stuhne, G. R., Wu, P. & Horton, B. P. (2022). Influence of 3D earth structure on glacial isostatic adjustment in the Russian Arctic. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(3), e2021JB023631-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023631 | Project: | MOE2019 -T3-1-004 MOE2018-T2-1-030 MOE-T2EP50120-0007 |
Journal: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth | Abstract: | Analyses of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) and deglacial relative sea-level (RSL) change in the Russian Arctic deliver important insights into the Earth's viscosity structure and the deglaciation history of the Eurasian ice sheet complex. Here, we validate the 1D GIA models ICE-6G_C (VM5a) and ICE-7G_NA (VM7) and select new 3D GIA models in the Russian Arctic against a quality-controlled deglacial RSL database of >500 sea-level data points from 24 regions. Both 1D models correspond to the RSL data along the southern coast of the Barents Sea and Franz Josef Land from ∼11 ka BP to present but show notable misfits (>50 m at 10 ka BP) with the White Sea data. We find 3D model predictions of deglacial RSL resolve most of the misfits with the observed data for the White Sea while retaining comparable fits in other regions of the Russian Arctic. Our results further reveal: (a) RSL in the western Russian Arctic is sensitive to elastic lithosphere with lateral thickness variation and 3D viscosity structure in the upper mantle; and (b) RSL in the whole Russian Arctic is less sensitive to 3D viscosity structure in the lower mantle compared to the upper mantle. The 3D models reveal a compromise in the upper mantle between the background viscosity and scaling factor to best fit the RSL data, which needs to be considered in future 3D GIA studies. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/157193 | ISSN: | 2169-9356 | DOI: | 10.1029/2021JB023631 | Schools: | Asian School of the Environment | Research Centres: | Earth Observatory of Singapore | Rights: | © 2022 The Authors.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | ASE Journal Articles EOS Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Li et al.-2022-Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth.pdf | Full Text | 2.02 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
50
4
Updated on Sep 23, 2023
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
50
2
Updated on Sep 28, 2023
Page view(s)
105
Updated on Oct 1, 2023
Download(s) 50
48
Updated on Oct 1, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.