Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTian, Juen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrinh, Thien Anen_US
dc.contributor.authorKalyan, Muppalla Nagaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHo, Jia Shinen_US
dc.contributor.authorChew, Jia Weien_US
dc.identifier.citationTian, J., Trinh, T. A., Kalyan, M. N., Ho, J. S. & Chew, J. W. (2020). In-situ monitoring of oil emulsion fouling in ultrafiltration via electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS): influence of surfactant. Journal of Membrane Science, 616, 118527-.
dc.description.abstractSome inconsistencies were found in the literature on the effect of surfactant type on membrane fouling by surfactant-stabilized oil emulsions. For instance, a recent study showed that the fouling trends revealed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) were incongruent with the flux decline trends. This study was targeted at providing more mechanistic insights on the evolution of the distinct membrane layers (namely, diffusion polarization, membrane skin and membrane microporous substrate layers) via electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The three surfactants investigated were cationic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), anionic sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and non-ionic Tween 20, the oil was hexadecane, and the ultrafiltration membrane was polyethersulfone (PES). The Tween 20-stabilized oil emulsions exhibited a greater flux decline than that of SDS, which agreed well with the relative shifts of the Nyquist plots and increase in conductance with time. Interestingly, the CTAB-stabilized oil emulsions exhibited a unique flux decline trend, in which the flux decline was the least in the initial 0.5 h then the worst beyond 0.75 h. Despite the negligible flux decline initially, EIS results indicated significant shifts of the Nyquist plots and increase of the conductance with time, which was tied to the extensive adsorption of CTAB. As filtration progressed beyond 0.5 h, the conductance and capacitance of the membrane skin layer in the case of CTAB-stabilized oil emulsions became respectively higher and lower than that in the case of CTAB alone, signifying that the deposition of oil emulsions had become more dominant than that of surfactants. Therefore, this study provided clear evidence that the surfactant oppositely charged to the membrane (i.e., CTAB) adsorbed extensively initially to give negligible flux decline, which was not the case for the surfactants that were similarly negatively charged like the membrane. This only lasted for 0.5 h beyond which fouling became pronounced per dictated by DLVO interaction energy.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic Development Board (EDB)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Education (MOE)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Membrane Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering::Chemical engineeringen_US
dc.titleIn-situ monitoring of oil emulsion fouling in ultrafiltration via electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS): influence of surfactanten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Chemical and Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.researchNanyang Environment and Water Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.researchSingapore Membrane Technology Centreen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSurfactant Chargeen_US
dc.subject.keywordsMembrane Foulingen_US
dc.description.acknowledgementWe acknowledge funding from the Singapore GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) – EDB (Economic Development Board) Trust Fund and Singapore Ministry of Education Tier 1 Grant (2019-T1-002-065).en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:NEWRI Journal Articles
SCBE Journal Articles

Citations 20

Updated on Jul 18, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 20

Updated on Oct 28, 2023

Page view(s)

Updated on Jul 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.