Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Does an early start help or hurt? Statehood, institutions and modern climate change policies||Authors:||Ang, James B.
Fredriksson, Per G.
|Keywords:||Social sciences::Economic theory||Issue Date:||2021||Source:||Ang, J. B. & Fredriksson, P. G. (2021). Does an early start help or hurt? Statehood, institutions and modern climate change policies. Energy Economics, 94, 105075-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105075||Journal:||Energy Economics||Abstract:||This paper first hypothesizes that countries that have accumulated more statehood experience over the last two millennia tend to have more stringent climate change policies. A second hypothesis is that there are also indirect effects via the rule of law, democracy, corruption, political instability, regulatory quality, and government effectiveness. Our empirical evidence provides support for these hypotheses. An early start helps both directly and indirectly. The strongest indirect effects occur through government effectiveness, rule of law, and corruption. Climate change policy analysis may take these findings into account and incorporate state capacity building and bureaucratic and legal reforms into the design of international environmental agreements. However, the effects are unlikely to arrive quickly.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/159828||ISSN:||0140-9883||DOI:||10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105075||Schools:||School of Social Sciences||Rights:||© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.||Fulltext Permission:||none||Fulltext Availability:||No Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SSS Journal Articles|
Updated on Sep 24, 2023
Web of ScienceTM
Updated on Sep 21, 2023
Updated on Sep 26, 2023
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.