Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160582
Title: | Predicting power conversion efficiency of organic photovoltaics: models and data analysis | Authors: | Eibeck, Andreas Nurkowski, Daniel Menon, Angiras Bai, Jiaru Wu, Jinkui Zhou, Li Mosbach, Sebastian Akroyd, Jethro Kraft, Markus |
Keywords: | Engineering::Chemical engineering | Issue Date: | 2021 | Source: | Eibeck, A., Nurkowski, D., Menon, A., Bai, J., Wu, J., Zhou, L., Mosbach, S., Akroyd, J. & Kraft, M. (2021). Predicting power conversion efficiency of organic photovoltaics: models and data analysis. ACS Omega, 6(37), 23764-23775. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02156 | Journal: | ACS omega | Abstract: | In this paper, the ability of three selected machine learning neural and baseline models in predicting the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic photovoltaics (OPVs) using molecular structure information as an input is assessed. The bidirectional long short-term memory (gFSI/BiLSTM), attentive fingerprints (attentive FP), and simple graph neural networks (simple GNN) as well as baseline support vector regression (SVR), random forests (RF), and high-dimensional model representation (HDMR) methods are trained to both the large and computational Harvard clean energy project database (CEPDB) and the much smaller experimental Harvard organic photovoltaic 15 dataset (HOPV15). It was found that the neural-based models generally performed better on the computational dataset with the attentive FP model reaching a state-of-the-art performance with the test set mean squared error of 0.071. The experimental dataset proved much harder to fit, with all of the models exhibiting a rather poor performance. Contrary to the computational dataset, the baseline models were found to perform better than the neural models. To improve the ability of machine learning models to predict PCEs for OPVs, either better computational results that correlate well with experiments or more experimental data at well-controlled conditions are likely required. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/160582 | ISSN: | 2470-1343 | DOI: | 10.1021/acsomega.1c02156 | Schools: | School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering | Organisations: | Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education | Rights: | © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | SCBE Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
acsomega.1c02156.pdf | 3.54 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
50
5
Updated on May 25, 2023
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
50
2
Updated on May 26, 2023
Page view(s)
168
Updated on May 31, 2023
Download(s)
14
Updated on May 31, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.