Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Airborne SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in hospital environment using high-flowrate air samplers and its comparison to surface sampling
Authors: Ang, Alicia X. Y.
Luhung, Irvan
Ahidjo, Bintou A.
Drautz-Moses, Daniela Isabel
Tambyah, Paul A.
Mok, Chee Keng
Lau, Kenny Jia Xu
Tham, Sai Meng
Chu, Justin Jang Hann
Allen, David M.
Schuster, Stephan Christoph
Keywords: Science::Medicine
Issue Date: 2022
Source: Ang, A. X. Y., Luhung, I., Ahidjo, B. A., Drautz-Moses, D. I., Tambyah, P. A., Mok, C. K., Lau, K. J. X., Tham, S. M., Chu, J. J. H., Allen, D. M. & Schuster, S. C. (2022). Airborne SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in hospital environment using high-flowrate air samplers and its comparison to surface sampling. Indoor Air, 32(1), e12930-.
Project: MOH-000411
Journal: Indoor Air
Abstract: Reliable methods to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 at venues where people gather are essential for epidemiological surveillance to guide public policy. Communal screening of air in a highly crowded space has the potential to provide early warning on the presence and potential transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as suggested by studies early in the epidemic. As hospitals and public facilities apply varying degrees of restrictions and regulations, it is important to provide multiple methodological options to enable environmental SARS-CoV-2 surveillance under different conditions. This study assessed the feasibility of using high-flowrate air samplers combined with RNA extraction kit designed for environmental sample to perform airborne SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in hospital setting, tested by RT-qPCR. The success rate of the air samples in detecting SARS-CoV-2 was then compared with surface swab samples collected in the same proximity. Additionally, positive RT-qPCR samples underwent viral culture to assess the viability of the sampled SARS-CoV-2. The study was performed in inpatient ward environments of a quaternary care university teaching hospital in Singapore housing active COVID-19 patients within the period of February to May 2020. Two types of wards were tested, naturally ventilated open-cohort ward and mechanically ventilated isolation ward. Distances between the site of air sampling and the patient cluster in the investigated wards were also recorded. No successful detection of airborne SARS-CoV-2 was recorded when 50 L/min air samplers were used. Upon increasing the sampling flowrate to 150 L/min, our results showed a high success rate in detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 from the air samples (72%) compared to the surface swab samples (9.6%). The positive detection rate of the air samples along with the corresponding viral load could be associated with the distance between sampling site and patient. The furthest distance from patient with PCR-positive air samples was 5.5 m. The airborne SARS-CoV-2 detection was comparable between the two types of wards with 60%-87.5% success rate. High prevalence of the virus was found in toilet areas, both on surfaces and in air. Finally, no successful culture attempt was recorded from the environmental air or surface samples.
ISSN: 0905-6947
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12930
Research Centres: Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences and Engineering 
Rights: © 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SCELSE Journal Articles

Citations 20

Updated on May 28, 2023

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 20

Updated on May 25, 2023

Page view(s)

Updated on May 30, 2023

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.