Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/16208
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFidelis Adhika Pradipta Lie
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-22T06:57:45Z
dc.date.available2009-05-22T06:57:45Z
dc.date.copyright2009en_US
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/16208
dc.description.abstractFormation flying of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has gain a lot of interest due to its many potential advantages. Flying in formation allows wider sensing coverage area and in effect, this leads to improved surveillance capability and enhanced situational awareness. Also flying in formation eases coordination and data fusion. This work addresses the issue of reconfiguration during a formation flight. It is an important issue, because at some points during its flight, the formation may need to be changed due to mission demands. Previously, the approach of such problem is by considering the reconfiguration as a part of mission planning. However, in order to provide a collision-free trajectories, the algorithm involved is usually time consuming and often computationally expensive. This work focuses on the reconfiguration control for non-hover-capable UAVs. The current premise is for the UAVs to assume their final target states within a specified time interval while avoiding collisions with one another or with an obstacle during the process. To achieve the mission, a reference trajectory is generated based on the two-point boundary values (TPBV) optimization of a double integrator. Sliding controller is then used to track the generated reference trajectory for its robustness. To avoid collisions, the area within the UAV's sensor detection range is modeled as a potential-like function that feeds directive control signals which varies with the distance between the UAV and the obstacles (could be stationary or moving) nearby. Such controller is shown to be stable in the sense of Lyapunov. Some simulations are carried out to assess the performance of the reconfiguration control scheme. It is found that provided sufficient safety margin exists between the moment of obstacle detection to the minimum safety radius of the UAV, the proposed control scheme gives a satisfactory performance for a collision-free reconfiguration.en_US
dc.format.extent64 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Control engineeringen_US
dc.titleRobust formation reconfiguration control methodology for unmanned aerial vehiclesen_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorGo Tiauw Hiongen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Engineering (Mechanical Engineering)en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
Appears in Collections:MAE Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
mA217.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 50

262
Updated on Jan 26, 2021

Download(s)

11
Updated on Jan 26, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.