Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162295
Title: A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools
Authors: Chandrasekaran, Ramya
Radzi, Shairah
Kai, Peh Zhen
Rajalingam, Preman
Rotgans, Jerome
Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy
Keywords: Science::Medicine
Issue Date: 2022
Source: Chandrasekaran, R., Radzi, S., Kai, P. Z., Rajalingam, P., Rotgans, J. & Mogali, S. R. (2022). A validated instrument measuring students' perceptions on plastinated and three-dimensional printed anatomy tools. Anatomical Sciences Education, 15(5), 850-862. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.2147
Project: MOE2018-TRF-007
Journal: Anatomical Sciences Education
Abstract: Due to the modernization of the medical curriculum and technological advancements, anatomy education has evolved beyond cadaveric dissection alone. Plastination techniques, three-dimensional (3D) modeling, and 3D printing technologies have progressively gained importance. However, there are limited valid and reliable surveys to evaluate students' perceptions of these new anatomy tools. Hence, this study aimed to develop a validated instrument to measure students' learning satisfaction, self-efficacy, humanistic values, and perceived limitations of plastinated and 3D printed models. A 41-item survey (five-point Likert scale, 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) was administered to Year 1 undergraduate medical students following a randomized controlled crossover study that evaluated plastinated and 3D printed cardiac and neck models. Ninety-six responses were received, and a factor analysis was performed with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy of 0.878. The confirmatory factor analysis yielded a 4-factor, 19 items model that had a good fit with the latent constructs of x 2 (147) = 211.568, P < 0.001, root mean square error of approximation = 0.068, root mean square residual = 0.064, comparative fit index = 0.946, and Tucker Lewis index = 0.937. The Cronbach's alpha for the individual factors ranged from 0.74 to 0.95, indicating good internal consistency. This demonstrated a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument to measure students' perceptions toward plastinated and 3D printed models.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/162295
ISSN: 1935-9772
DOI: 10.1002/ase.2147
Rights: © 2021 American Association for Anatomy. All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:LKCMedicine Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
Updated on Nov 28, 2022

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 50

1
Updated on Dec 3, 2022

Page view(s)

23
Updated on Dec 3, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.