Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Mapping risk and benefit perceptions of energy sources: comparing public and expert mental models in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore
Authors: Ho, Shirley S.
Yu, Peihan
Tandoc, Edson C.
Chuah, Agnes S. F.
Keywords: Social sciences::Communication
Issue Date: 2022
Source: Ho, S. S., Yu, P., Tandoc, E. C. & Chuah, A. S. F. (2022). Mapping risk and benefit perceptions of energy sources: comparing public and expert mental models in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. Energy Research and Social Science, 88, 102500-.
Journal: Energy Research and Social Science 
Abstract: Traditionally reliant on fossil fuels, Southeast Asian countries – Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore – plan to introduce cleaner energy (e.g., renewable energy) into their energy mix. To gauge public support, an understanding of their risk and benefit perceptions of energy technologies is necessary. In the absence of technical knowledge, lay people may form these perceptions based on existing mental models – these are individuals' internal representations of the external world that can affect how they perceive various issues. Using the mental models approach, the current study examines and compares the public's and energy experts' mental models in an attempt to understand how risks and benefits of energy technologies are perceived, as well as gaps in the public's understanding and information needs. We conducted online focus group discussions in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore with 78 members of the public and 26 energy experts. The public and energy experts were found to have broadly similar considerations about energy security, economic and environmental impacts, and safety of energy technologies, but they differed in how they thought about them. While energy experts had relied on their topical expertise and existing evidence to form risk and benefit perceptions, the public had relied on other contextual factors to do so, such as their place-identities, religious beliefs, and personal values. Misleading analogies were also found to have played a role. The findings' implications on public policies and communication strategies are discussed.
ISSN: 2214-6296
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102500
Schools: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information 
Rights: © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:WKWSCI Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2214629622000081-main.pdf4.38 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Citations 50

Updated on Feb 16, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 50

Updated on Oct 24, 2023

Page view(s)

Updated on Feb 20, 2024

Download(s) 50

Updated on Feb 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.