Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Clinical information quality of digital health technologies: protocol for an international eDelphi study||Authors:||Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip
Wark, Petra A.
|Keywords:||Science::Medicine||Issue Date:||2022||Source:||Fadahunsi, K. P., Wark, P. A., Mastellos, N., Gallagher, J., Majeed, A. & Car, J. (2022). Clinical information quality of digital health technologies: protocol for an international eDelphi study. BMJ Open, 12(4), e057430-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057430||Journal:||BMJ Open||Abstract:||Introduction: Digital health technologies (DHTs) such as electronic health records, clinical decision support systems and electronic prescribing systems are widely used in healthcare. While adoption of DHTs can improve healthcare delivery, information quality (IQ) problems associated with DHTs can compromise quality and safety of care. The clinical information quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health is a novel approach to assessing the quality of clinical information from DHTs. This study aims to appraise the CLIQ framework by exploring clinicians’ perspectives on the relevance, definition and assessment of IQ dimensions as defined in the framework. This study will adapt the CLIQ framework to the needs of clinical information users—the clinicians. The contextualised CLIQ framework will offer a pragmatic approach to assessing clinical information from DHTs and may help to forestall IQ problems that can compromise quality and safety of care. Methods and analysis: The electronic Delphi (eDelphi) approach will be used to engage a heterogeneous group of clinicians with patient-facing and/or information governance roles recruited through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. A semi-structured online questionnaire will be used to explore clinicians’ perspectives on relevance, definition and assessment of IQ dimensions in the CLIQ framework. Survey responses on the relevance of dimensions will be summarised using descriptive statistics to inform decisions on retention of dimensions and termination of the study, based on prespecified rules. Analysis of the free-text responses will be used to revise definition and assessment of dimensions. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Imperial College Research Governance and Integrity Team (Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (ICREC) Reference number: 20IC6396). The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163260||ISSN:||2044-6055||DOI:||10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057430||Rights:||© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Published by BMJ. Open access. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||LKCMedicine Journal Articles|
Updated on Jan 31, 2023
Updated on Feb 5, 2023
Updated on Feb 5, 2023
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.