Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163754
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeo, Edwina Jia Yien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-17T13:47:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-17T13:47:25Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationNeo, E. J. Y. (2023). Sustainable consumption - how to tell which goods are more sustainable? Comparing between fashion brands in Singapore. Final Year Project (FYP), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/163754en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/163754-
dc.description.abstractThe fashion industry is responsible for 10% of global carbon dioxide output and many other environmental impacts. With progress on transparency in the global fashion industry still being too slow, many consumers are unaware of the environmental impacts of the fashion product life cycle and are sometimes misdirected by claims of sustainability improvements and efforts. Consumers hence consume fashion products without realizing what is the true cost of fashion. This report hence aims to show how Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can be used to assess and compare the environmental impacts of the product life cycle of fashion brands. The data required for the study of three fashion brands will be modelled against three fashion brands operating in Singapore, renamed to Brand A, B, and C to maintain anonymity. Research was first conducted to gather all necessary data from the material extraction phase to the end-of-life phase to be entered into the LCA tool, Simapro v9.4.0, where results will show the environmental impacts of a product life cycle based on impact categories specified by the chosen method used. As mentioned earlier, there is a lack of transparency in the fashion industry. This means there were limited data provided and published by the brands regarding their own consumption and waste disposal methods. Thus, assumptions had to be made in order to complete data collection before inputs can be entered into Simapro. Results from Simapro were then analysed during Impact Assessment, where the highest impacted categories were identified to find out the cause of impacts. The report then concludes by identifying the least and most sustainable brands to highlight the better consumption choice for fashion retail consumers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNanyang Technological Universityen_US
dc.relationMS-41en_US
dc.subjectEngineering::Environmental engineering::Environmental protectionen_US
dc.subjectEngineering::Environmental engineering::Environmental pollutionen_US
dc.titleSustainable consumption - how to tell which goods are more sustainable? Comparing between fashion brands in Singaporeen_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorQian Shunzhien_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Science (Maritime Studies)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisoremailSZQian@ntu.edu.sgen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
Appears in Collections:CEE Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FYP MS41 Final Report - Neo Jia Yi Edwina.pdf
  Restricted Access
19.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

282
Updated on Jun 15, 2024

Download(s)

19
Updated on Jun 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.