Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChng, Joycelyn Pei Shi.-
dc.description.abstractLattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) computationally can be split into two steps process: advection and collision. Theoretically, since there are no floating point operations in the advection process, the execution of the advection scheme should be negligible compared to collision. However, in reality it takes about the same time as collision step which involves floating point operations. Thus, implementation of advection needs to be carefully designed for efficiency reason. In this report, three different advection algorithms are discussed and compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. Kida flow is also used to test the efficiency and accuracy of our D3Q15 model. The results are in good agreement with the qualitative data established by Shyam. Quantitative analysis of the data will be left for future work.en_US
dc.format.extent66 p.en_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University-
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineeringen_US
dc.titleLattice Boltzmann method.en_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorAnsumali Santoshen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Chemical and Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Engineering (Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering)en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:SCBE Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
1.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 50

Updated on Jan 27, 2021


Updated on Jan 27, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.