Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Zhi Mian.-
dc.description.abstractIn view of research that in-group evaluation does not have a direct implication on out-group evaluation, the effect of in-group identification, perceived leave difficulty and audience one is communicating to on out-group evaluation is examined in this paper. Results obtained using an undergraduate sample (N = 115) did not support the hypothesised three-way interaction between the proposed variables. In-group identification did not serve as a moderator on out-group evaluation. Perceived leave difficulty did not have an effect on out-group evaluation too. Evidence was however found for higher out-group favouritism as compared to out-group derogation, and audience was found to have an effect on out-group favouritism. Implications of findings on out-group evaluation on intergroup relations are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent78 p.en_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University-
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology::Social psychology-
dc.titleWhat matters when we speak about others? Identification, leave difficulty and audience on out-group evaluation.en_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorWan Chingen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Artsen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
422.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

checked on Oct 19, 2020


checked on Oct 19, 2020

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.