Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169017
Title: A machine-learning-based event-triggered model predictive control for building energy management
Authors: Yang, Shiyu
Chen, Wanyu
Wan, Man Pun
Keywords: Engineering::Mechanical engineering
Issue Date: 2023
Source: Yang, S., Chen, W. & Wan, M. P. (2023). A machine-learning-based event-triggered model predictive control for building energy management. Building and Environment, 233, 110101-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110101
Project: NRF2016IDM-TRANS001-031 
Journal: Building and Environment
Abstract: Model predictive control (MPC) for building energy management has exhibited a huge potential for largely cutting down energy use and improving human comfort. However, the high demand for computational power for solving the optimization is challenging the widespread deployment of MPC in real buildings. Typical MPC employs a time-triggered mechanism (TTM) that runs optimization recurrently at each time step without considering the necessity, which could cause excessive computation resource usage. This paper proposes an event-triggered mechanism (ETM) that only runs optimization when triggering events occur. Contrary to conventional ETMs that only considers the current information (e.g., room conditions), the ETM proposed is based on a cost function that covers the past, current, and future information. Based on the proposed ETM, a machine-learning-based event-triggered model predictive control (ETMPC) system that optimizes both building energy efficiency and thermal comfort is developed. The developed ETMPC system is then employed for air-conditioning control for performance evaluation through simulations. The control performance of the proposed ETMPC is compared to an MPC employing TTM and a common thermostat. Compared to the MPC employing TTM, the proposed ETMPC reduced the computational load in terms of the number of optimization runs by 77.6%–88.2%, meanwhile, achieving similar energy savings (more than 9.3% energy saving over the thermostat) as the MPC employing TTM does (9% energy saving over the thermostat). With the significant reduction of computational load, the ETMPC achieves similar thermal comfort performance as the MPC employing TTM does, and it is significantly better over the thermostat.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/169017
ISSN: 0360-1323
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110101
Schools: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 
Research Centres: Energy Research Institute @ NTU (ERI@N) 
Rights: © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:ERI@N Journal Articles
MAE Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

11
Updated on Jul 14, 2024

Page view(s)

129
Updated on Jul 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.