Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: War of the words: how individuals respond to "fake news," "misinformation," "disinformation," and "online falsehoods"
Authors: Tandoc, Edson C.
Seet, Seith Kai
Keywords: Social sciences::Communication
Issue Date: 2022
Source: Tandoc, E. C. & Seet, S. K. (2022). War of the words: how individuals respond to "fake news," "misinformation," "disinformation," and "online falsehoods". Journalism Practice, 1-17.
Project: MOE2018-SSRTG-022
RG 150/18 
Journal: Journalism Practice
Abstract: While some argue the term “fake news” has lost its meaning and should be discarded from academic lexicon, others say the term has conceptual utility and one that the public understands. This study revisits these arguments and compares how individuals respond to the term “fake news” with how they respond to other related terms, such as “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “online falsehoods.” Through an online survey involving a representative sample of 1,015 adult participants in Singapore, this study found that participants who saw the term “fake news” reported the highest level of perceptions of falsity and intentionality. The term “fake news” also elicited the highest level of concern, perceived severity, and treatment recommendation, although the terms “misinformation” and “online falsehoods” also displayed similar levels, while “disinformation” elicited the lowest ratings.
ISSN: 1751-2786
DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2022.2110929
Schools: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information 
Rights: © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:WKWSCI Journal Articles

Citations 50

Updated on Sep 25, 2023

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 50

Updated on Sep 25, 2023

Page view(s)

Updated on Sep 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.