Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171030
Title: | Flow structures and aerodynamic behavior of a small-scale joined-wing aerial vehicle under subsonic conditions | Authors: | New, Tze How Teo, Zhen Wei Li, Shiya Ong, Z. A. Nagel, Björn |
Keywords: | Engineering::Aeronautical engineering | Issue Date: | 2023 | Source: | New, T. H., Teo, Z. W., Li, S., Ong, Z. A. & Nagel, B. (2023). Flow structures and aerodynamic behavior of a small-scale joined-wing aerial vehicle under subsonic conditions. Aerospace, 10(8), 661-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10080661 | Journal: | Aerospace | Abstract: | Flow behavior and aerodynamic performance of a small-scale joined-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) was studied experimentally and numerically under various pitch and yaw angle combinations in subsonic flow conditions. Selected numerical results are compared against experimental results obtained using surface oil flow visualizations and force measurements, with additional simulations expanding the range of combined pitch and yaw configurations. Under zero-yaw conditions, increasing the pitch angle leads to the formation of symmetric ogive vortex roll-ups close to the fuselage and their significant interactions with the fore-wing. Additionally, contributions to lift and drag coefficients under zero-yaw conditions by the key UAV components have been documented in detail. In contrast, when the UAV is subjected to combined pitch and yaw, no clear evidence of such ogive vortex roll-ups can be observed. Instead, asymmetric flow separations occur over the fuselage’s port side and resemble bluff-body flow behavior. Additionally, these flow separations become more complex, and they interact more with the fuselage and fore- and aft-wings when the yaw angle increases. Lift and drag variations due to different pitch and yaw angle combinations are also documented. Finally, rolling and yawing moment results suggest that the present UAV possesses adequate flight stability unless the pitch and yaw angles are high. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171030 | ISSN: | 2226-4310 | DOI: | 10.3390/aerospace10080661 | Schools: | School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering | Rights: | © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | MAE Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
aerospace-10-00661.pdf | 22.39 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
50
2
Updated on May 2, 2025
Page view(s)
141
Updated on May 6, 2025
Download(s) 50
40
Updated on May 6, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.