Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171434
Title: | Enhanced extraction of brominated flame retardants from e-waste plastics | Authors: | Das, Pallab Zeng, Qiang Leybros, Antoine Gabriel, Jean-Christophe P. Tay, Chor Yong Lee, Jong-Min |
Keywords: | Engineering::Chemical engineering | Issue Date: | 2023 | Source: | Das, P., Zeng, Q., Leybros, A., Gabriel, J. P., Tay, C. Y. & Lee, J. (2023). Enhanced extraction of brominated flame retardants from e-waste plastics. Chemical Engineering Journal, 469, 144126-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144126 | Project: | USS-IF-2018-4 CTRL-2022-1D-01 |
Journal: | Chemical Engineering Journal | Abstract: | Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is a high utility engineering thermoplastic, abundantly present in waste electronic and electrical goods. The demand for this plastic resin increases continuously with rapid industrial growth across the world. During the recycling of e-waste plastics, it is a common occurrence to find brominated flame retardants, such as Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in the plastic. These flame retardants are intentionally added to the plastics as additives. Three processes were investigated to find the optimum solvent/antisolvent combinations, process parameters for the efficient recovery of TBBPA free plastics: microwave assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), and dissolution reprecipitation (DR). Rigorous solvent screening was carried out for both TBBPA and ABS using Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSP), and their interactions with the solvents were investigated with a molecular based Conductor like Screening Model for Realistic Solvents (COSMO-RS) software platform. A 4:1 (v/v) solvent mixture of 1-propanol and heptane was found to be ideal for the solid–liquid extraction process. The optimal extraction conditions (Temperature = 110 – 130 °C, time = 60 to 70 min solid/liquid ratio of 0.025) in MAE were predicted using machine learning based Support Vector Regression (SVR) technique. MAE was found to be superior to UAE and DR processes in terms of quantity and quality of recovered plastics. The maximum extraction efficiencies for TBBPA removal were achieved with MAE, UAE, and DR processes at 95.81%, 93.92%, and 98.15%, respectively. However, the DR process had a relatively lower plastic recovery. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171434 | ISSN: | 1385-8947 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144126 | Schools: | School of Materials Science and Engineering School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology |
Research Centres: | Energy Research Institute @ NTU (ERI@N) Singapore-CEA Alliance for Research in Circular Economy |
Rights: | © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | Fulltext Permission: | none | Fulltext Availability: | No Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | ERI@N Journal Articles |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
20
12
Updated on Mar 11, 2025
Page view(s)
174
Updated on Mar 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.