Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171931
Title: Monte Carlo drift correction – quantifying the drift uncertainty of global climate models
Authors: Grandey, Benjamin S.
Koh, Zhi Yang
Samanta, Dhrubajyoti
Horton, Benjamin Peter
Dauwels, Justin
Chew, Lock Yue
Keywords: Science::Physics::Meteorology and climatology
Science::Physics::Geophysics and geomagnetism
Issue Date: 2023
Source: Grandey, B. S., Koh, Z. Y., Samanta, D., Horton, B. P., Dauwels, J. & Chew, L. Y. (2023). Monte Carlo drift correction – quantifying the drift uncertainty of global climate models. Geoscientific Model Development, 16(22), 6593-6608. https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6593-2023
Project: USS-IF-2020-3 
Journal: Geoscientific Model Development 
Abstract: Global climate models are susceptible to drift, causing spurious trends in output variables. Drift is often corrected using data from a control simulation. However, internal climate variability within the control simulation introduces uncertainty to the drift correction process. To quantify this drift uncertainty, we develop a probabilistic technique: Monte Carlo drift correction (MCDC). MCDC samples the standard error associated with drift in the control time series. We apply MCDC to an ensemble of global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). We find that drift correction partially addresses a problem related to drift: energy leakage. Nevertheless, the energy balance of several models remains suspect. We quantify the drift uncertainty of global quantities associated with the Earth's energy balance and thermal expansion of the ocean. When correcting drift in a cumulatively integrated energy flux, we find that it is preferable to integrate the flux before correcting the drift: an alternative method would be to correct the bias before integrating the flux, but this alternative method amplifies the drift uncertainty. Assuming that drift is linear likely leads to an underestimation of drift uncertainty. Time series with weak trends may be especially susceptible to drift uncertainty: for historical thermosteric sea level rise since the 1850s, the drift uncertainty can range from 3 to 24 mm, which is of comparable magnitude to the impact of omitting volcanic forcing in control simulations. Derived coefficients – such as the ocean's expansion efficiency of heat – can also be susceptible to drift uncertainty. When evaluating and analysing global climate model data that are susceptible to drift, researchers should consider drift uncertainty.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/171931
ISSN: 1991-959X
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-16-6593-2023
DOI (Related Dataset): 10.5281/zenodo.8219778
Schools: School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences 
Asian School of the Environment 
Research Centres: Earth Observatory of Singapore 
Rights: © Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SPMS Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Grandey_etal_GMD2023.pdfPublished PDF3.24 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s)

109
Updated on Jun 19, 2024

Download(s)

31
Updated on Jun 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.