Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178436
Title: The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review
Authors: Toh, Wei Xing
Keh, Jun Sheng
Gross, James J.
Carstensen, Laura L.
Keywords: Social Sciences
Issue Date: 2024
Source: Toh, W. X., Keh, J. S., Gross, J. J. & Carstensen, L. L. (2024). The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review. Emotion. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0001373
Project: RS 05/23
03INS001567C430
Journal: Emotion
Abstract: Cognitive reappraisal refers to the reinterpretation of a situation to alter its emotional meaning. Theoretically, executive functions (EFs), such as inhibition, updating, and shifting, are core elements of reappraisal processes. However, empirical studies have yielded inconsistent evidence as to whether and to what extent EFs are associated with reappraisal. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of the literature in which 179 effect sizes from 59 independent samples (N = 4,703) were included. Using random-effects metaregression with robust-variance estimates and small-sample corrections, we also examined whether variation in effect sizes could be accounted for by potential moderators, such as the way reappraisal was assessed (i.e., questionnaires vs. task-based measures) and the type of stimuli used in EF tasks (i.e., affective vs. nonaffective). Overall, results indicate relatively small to typical associations between reappraisal and all three EFs (rs = .13–.19). While the way reappraisal was measured did not moderate any of the relations between EF and reappraisal, we found stronger relations between inhibition and reappraisal when EF was assessed using tasks that involved affective, relative to nonaffective, stimuli. Our meta-analytic findings offer modest support for the idea that EFs are cognitive constituents of reappraisal processes.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178436
ISSN: 1528-3542
DOI: 10.1037/emo0001373
Schools: School of Social Sciences 
Rights: © 2024 American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SSS Journal Articles

Page view(s)

60
Updated on Sep 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.