Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178478
Title: | Modelling the distribution of cognitive outcomes for early-stage neurocognitive disorders: a model comparison approach | Authors: | Saffari, Seyed Ehsan Soo, See Ann Mohammadi, Raziyeh Ng, Kok Pin Greene, William Kandiah, Negaenderan |
Keywords: | Medicine, Health and Life Sciences | Issue Date: | 2024 | Source: | Saffari, S. E., Soo, S. A., Mohammadi, R., Ng, K. P., Greene, W. & Kandiah, N. (2024). Modelling the distribution of cognitive outcomes for early-stage neurocognitive disorders: a model comparison approach. Biomedicines, 12(2), 393-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020393 | Project: | MOE2017-T3-1-002 MOH-CSAINV18nov-0007 NNI-HREF 991016 CNIG22jul-0004 |
Journal: | Biomedicines | Abstract: | Background: Cognitive assessments for patients with neurocognitive disorders are mostly measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Visual Cognitive Assessment Test (VCAT) as screening tools. These cognitive scores are usually left-skewed and the results of the association analysis might not be robust. This study aims to study the distribution of the cognitive outcomes and to discuss potential solutions. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of individuals with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment, the inverse-transformed cognitive outcomes are modelled using different statistical distributions. The robustness of the proposed models are checked under different scenarios: with intercept-only, models with covariates, and with and without bootstrapping. Results: The main results were based on the VCAT score and validated via the MoCA score. The findings suggested that the inverse transformation method improved the modelling the cognitive scores compared to the conventional methods using the original cognitive scores. The association of the baseline characteristics (age, gender, and years of education) and the cognitive outcomes were reported as estimates and 95% confidence intervals. Bootstrap methods improved the estimate precision and the bootstrapped standard errors of the estimates were more robust. Cognitive outcomes were widely analysed using linear regression models with the default normal distribution as a conventional method. We compared the results of our suggested models with the normal distribution under various scenarios. Goodness-of-fit measurements were compared between the proposed models and conventional methods. Conclusions: The findings support the use of the inverse transformation method to model the cognitive outcomes instead of the original cognitive scores for early-stage neurocognitive disorders where the cognitive outcomes are left-skewed. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178478 | ISSN: | 2227-9059 | DOI: | 10.3390/biomedicines12020393 | Schools: | Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) | Organisations: | Duke-NUS Medical School | Research Centres: | Dementia Research Centre | Rights: | © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | LKCMedicine Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
biomedicines-12-00393.pdf | 1.62 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
50
1
Updated on Nov 28, 2024
Page view(s)
65
Updated on Dec 1, 2024
Download(s)
15
Updated on Dec 1, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.