Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178561
Title: | Evaluation of a digital Amsler grid (PocDoc) for macular disease screening: a comparative analysis with the conventional method | Authors: | Boon, Joewee Rojas-Carabali, William Asad, Yusra Lim, Jonathan Tzien Yih Rajagopalan, Rajesh Agrawal, Rupesh |
Keywords: | Medicine, Health and Life Sciences | Issue Date: | 2024 | Source: | Boon, J., Rojas-Carabali, W., Asad, Y., Lim, J. T. Y., Rajagopalan, R. & Agrawal, R. (2024). Evaluation of a digital Amsler grid (PocDoc) for macular disease screening: a comparative analysis with the conventional method. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 13(5), 1289-1301. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-00910-5 | Project: | NTF_DEC2019_I_C1_C_02 | Journal: | Ophthalmology and Therapy | Abstract: | Introduction: Macular diseases are major contributors to visual impairment and blindness worldwide. This study introduces PocDoc, a digital version of the conventional Amsler grid, aimed at enhancing the screening and monitoring of macular diseases. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation to compare the effectiveness of PocDoc against the conventional method. Methods: Our comparative analysis involved two distinct phases. Initially, we assessed the capability of both PocDoc and the conventional method in detecting central visual field abnormalities. This phase included a cohort of 72 healthy and 155 eyes affected by various conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), uveitis, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and macular telangiectasia. We primarily focused on the area of compromise and observed the correlation between the results obtained from both methods, measuring their concordance using a correlation coefficient. In the second phase, we evaluated the accuracy of both methods in diagnosing AMD. This involved a group of 127 eyes, including 70 healthy and 57 AMD-affected eyes. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of each method in diagnosing AMD. Results: In the initial phase, both PocDoc and the conventional Amsler grid demonstrated a high correlation in detecting central visual field defects across various macular diseases (correlation coefficient[ 0.9). In the second phase, focused on AMD diagnosis, PocDoc showed a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 100%, and an overall accuracy of 78%. Comparatively, the conventional method exhibited a sensitivity of 49%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 77%. Conclusion: PocDoc’s digital Amsler grid exhibits comparable effectiveness to the conventional method in both detecting visual field abnormalities across a range of macular diseases and specifically in the diagnosis of AMD. The high correlation in results, combined with the digital advantages of PocDoc, such as ease of use and potential for telemedicine applications, suggests its viability as a valuable tool in the screening and monitoring of macular diseases. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178561 | ISSN: | 2193-8245 | DOI: | 10.1007/s40123-024-00910-5 | Schools: | Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) | Organisations: | Tan Tock Seng Hospital Singapore Eye Research Institute Duke NUS Medical School |
Rights: | © 2024 The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | LKCMedicine Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s40123-024-00910-5.pdf | 1.82 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Page view(s)
79
Updated on Mar 16, 2025
Download(s)
25
Updated on Mar 16, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.