Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179007
Title: Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine to prevent and treat COVID-19 household close contacts in Hong Kong: an open-label, randomized controlled trial
Authors: Du, Peipei
Lam, Wai Ching
Leung, Choryin
Li, Huijuan
Lyu, Zipan
Yuen, Chun Sum
Cheung, Chun Hoi
Lam, Tsz Fung
Bian, Zhaoxiang
Zhong, Linda Lidan
Keywords: Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Issue Date: 2024
Source: Du, P., Lam, W. C., Leung, C., Li, H., Lyu, Z., Yuen, C. S., Cheung, C. H., Lam, T. F., Bian, Z. & Zhong, L. L. (2024). Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine to prevent and treat COVID-19 household close contacts in Hong Kong: an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Immunology, 15, 1359331-. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1359331
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology 
Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CHM in the prevention of COVID-19 infection and treatment for COVID-19 related symptoms. Design: Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Setting: Participants’ home in Hong Kong. Participants: Participants who had household close contact with COVID-19-infected family members. Interventions: Close contacts were stratified into 4 groups (cohort A, B, C, D) based on symptoms and infection status and were randomized in 4:1 ratio to receive CHM granules (9g/sachet, two times daily) or blank control for 7 days with 2 weeks of follow-up. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the rate of positive nucleic acid tests. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of developed COVID-19 related symptoms and adverse events during the whole 3-week study period. Subgroup analysis was used to evaluate demographic factors associated with positive infection rates. Results: A total of 2163 contacts were enrolled and randomly assigned to the CHM group (1720 contacts) and blank control (443 contacts) group. During the 21 days, the rate of PCR-positive cases in cohort A was markedly lower in the CHM group (3.6%) compared to the control group (7.0%) (P=0.036). Overall, the rate of infection in the CHM group was significantly lower than that in the control group (10.69% vs. 6.03%; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.82) after 7-day treatment. No serious adverse events were reported during the medication period. Conclusion: The preliminary findings indicate that CHM may be effective and safe in preventing COVID-19. Future double-blind, randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up are needed to fully evaluate the efficacy of CHM in a larger contact population. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05269511.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179007
ISSN: 1664-3224
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1359331
Schools: School of Biological Sciences 
Rights: © 2024 Du, Lam, Leung, Li, Lyu, Yuen, Cheung, Lam, Bian and Zhong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SBS Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fimmu-15-1359331.pdf925.8 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s)

104
Updated on May 7, 2025

Download(s) 50

45
Updated on May 7, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.