Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179248
Title: Comment on Matisoff's comparison between Greenberg and Benedict
Authors: Benedict, Paul K.
Keywords: Arts and Humanities
Issue Date: 1991
Source: Benedict, P. K. (1991). Comment on Matisoff's comparison between Greenberg and Benedict. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 14(2), 169-170. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.14.2.08
Journal: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Abstract: In his recent discussion note "On megalocomparison" (Language 66:1.106-20, 1990). James A. Matisoff has described me as a "megalo-comparativist" and has compared (and contrasted) my methods with those pursued by Joseph H. Greenberg. He also reports that I favor a 'jigsaw puzzle" approach as contrasted with Greenberg's obsession for "pigeonholing" (colurnblcubiculomania). I do indeed attempt to fit linguistic pieces together (see below) but I resolutely deny being a megalocomparativist. As I see it. Greenberg and I are simply playing different games and the contrast in our approaches reflects that basic difference.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179248
ISSN: 0731-3500
DOI: 10.32655/LTBA.14.2.08
Rights: © 1991 The Editor(s). All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area (LTBA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
08 benedict1991comment.pdf1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

33
Updated on Sep 19, 2024

Download(s)

3
Updated on Sep 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.