Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179248
Title: | Comment on Matisoff's comparison between Greenberg and Benedict | Authors: | Benedict, Paul K. | Keywords: | Arts and Humanities | Issue Date: | 1991 | Source: | Benedict, P. K. (1991). Comment on Matisoff's comparison between Greenberg and Benedict. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 14(2), 169-170. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.14.2.08 | Journal: | Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area | Abstract: | In his recent discussion note "On megalocomparison" (Language 66:1.106-20, 1990). James A. Matisoff has described me as a "megalo-comparativist" and has compared (and contrasted) my methods with those pursued by Joseph H. Greenberg. He also reports that I favor a 'jigsaw puzzle" approach as contrasted with Greenberg's obsession for "pigeonholing" (colurnblcubiculomania). I do indeed attempt to fit linguistic pieces together (see below) but I resolutely deny being a megalocomparativist. As I see it. Greenberg and I are simply playing different games and the contrast in our approaches reflects that basic difference. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179248 | ISSN: | 0731-3500 | DOI: | 10.32655/LTBA.14.2.08 | Rights: | © 1991 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area (LTBA) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
08 benedict1991comment.pdf | 1.21 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
33
Updated on Sep 19, 2024
Download(s)
3
Updated on Sep 19, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.