Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179614
Title: | Disentangling direct vs indirect effects of microbiome manipulations in a habitat-forming marine holobiont | Authors: | McGrath, Alexander Harry Lema, Kimberley Egan, Suhelen Wood, Georgina Gonzalez, Sebastian Vadillo Kjelleberg, Staffan Steinberg, Peter David Marzinelli, Ezequiel Miguel |
Keywords: | Medicine, Health and Life Sciences | Issue Date: | 2024 | Source: | McGrath, A. H., Lema, K., Egan, S., Wood, G., Gonzalez, S. V., Kjelleberg, S., Steinberg, P. D. & Marzinelli, E. M. (2024). Disentangling direct vs indirect effects of microbiome manipulations in a habitat-forming marine holobiont. Npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 10(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41522-024-00503-x | Journal: | npj Biofilms and Microbiomes | Abstract: | Host-associated microbiota are critical for eukaryotic host functioning, to the extent that hosts and their associated microbial communities are often considered “holobionts”. Most studies of holobionts have focused on descriptive approaches or have used model systems, usually in the laboratory, to understand host-microbiome interactions. To advance our understanding of host-microbiota interactions and their wider ecological impacts, we need experimental frameworks that can explore causation in non-model hosts, which often have highly diverse microbiota, and in their natural ecological setting (i.e. in the field). We used a dominant habitat-forming seaweed, Hormosira banksii, to explore these issues and to experimentally test host-microbiota interactions in a non-model holobiont. The experimental protocols were aimed at trying to disentangle microbially mediated effects on hosts from direct effects on hosts associated with the methods employed to manipulate host-microbiota. This was done by disrupting the microbiome, either through removal/disruption using a combination of antimicrobial treatments, or additions of specific taxa via inoculations, or a combination of thew two. The experiments were done in mesocosms and in the field. Three different antibiotic treatments were used to disrupt seaweed-associated microbiota to test whether disturbances of microbiota, particularly bacteria, would negatively affect host performance. Responses of bacteria to these disturbances were complex and differed substantially among treatments, with some antibacterial treatments having little discernible effect. However, the temporal sequence of responses antibiotic treatments, changes in bacterial diversity and subsequent decreases in host performance, strongly suggested an effect of the microbiota on host performance in some treatments, as opposed to direct effects of the antibiotics. To further test these effects, we used 16S-rRNA-gene sequencing to identify bacterial taxa that were either correlated, or uncorrelated, with poor host performance following antibiotic treatment. These were then isolated and used in inoculation experiments, independently or in combination with the previously used antibiotic treatments. Negative effects on host performance were strongest where specific microbial antimicrobials treatments were combined with inoculations of strains that were correlated with poor host performance. For these treatments, negative host effects persisted the entire experimental period (12 days), even though treatments were only applied at the beginning of the experiment. Host performance recovered in all other treatments. These experiments provide a framework for exploring causation and disentangling microbially mediated vs. direct effects on hosts for ecologically important, non-model holobionts in the field. This should allow for better predictions of how these systems will respond to, and potentially mitigate, environmental disturbances in their natural context. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179614 | ISSN: | 2055-5008 | DOI: | 10.1038/s41522-024-00503-x | Research Centres: | Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences and Engineering | Rights: | © 2024 The Author(s), corrected publication 2024. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | SCELSE Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s41522-024-00503-x.pdf | 1.13 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
50
2
Updated on Jan 15, 2025
Page view(s)
65
Updated on Jan 20, 2025
Download(s)
8
Updated on Jan 20, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.