Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179867
Title: | Current frailty knowledge, awareness, and practices among physicians following the 2022 European consensus document on Frailty in Cardiology | Authors: | Wong, Jie Jun Wang, Laureen Yi-Ting Hasegawa, Koji Ho, Kay Woon Huang, Zijuan Teo, Louis L. Y. Tan, Jack Wei Chieh Kasahara, Kazuyuki Tan, Ru-San Ge, Junbo Koh, Angela S. |
Keywords: | Medicine, Health and Life Sciences | Issue Date: | 2024 | Source: | Wong, J. J., Wang, L. Y., Hasegawa, K., Ho, K. W., Huang, Z., Teo, L. L. Y., Tan, J. W. C., Kasahara, K., Tan, R., Ge, J. & Koh, A. S. (2024). Current frailty knowledge, awareness, and practices among physicians following the 2022 European consensus document on Frailty in Cardiology. European Heart Journal Open, 4(2), oeae025-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae025 | Journal: | European Heart Journal Open | Abstract: | Aims: Aging-related cardiovascular disease and frailty burdens are anticipated to rise with global aging. In response to directions from major cardiovascular societies, we investigated frailty knowledge, awareness, and practices among cardiologists as key stakeholders in this emerging paradigm a year after the European Frailty in Cardiology consensus document was published. Methods and results: We launched a prospective multinational web-based survey via social networks to broad cardiology communities representing multiple World Health Organization regions, including Western Pacific and Southeast Asia regions. Overall, 578 respondents [38.2% female; ages 35–49 years (55.2%) and 50–64 years (34.4%)] across subspecialties, including interventionists (43.3%), general cardiologists (30.6%), and heart failure specialists (HFSs) (10.9%), were surveyed. Nearly half had read the consensus document (38.9%). Non-interventionists had better perceived knowledge of frailty assessment instruments (fully or vaguely aware, 57.2% vs. 45%, adj. P = 0.0002), exercise programmes (well aware, 12.9% vs. 6.0%, adj. P = 0.001), and engaged more in multidisciplinary team care (frequently or occasionally, 52.6% vs. 41%, adj. P = 0.002) than interventionists. Heart failure specialists more often addressed pre-procedural frailty (frequently or occasionally, 43.5% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.004) and polypharmacy (frequently or occasionally, 85.5% vs. 71%, adj. P = 0.014) and had consistently better composite knowledge (39.3% vs. 21.6%, adj. P = 0.001) and practice responses (21% vs. 11.1%, adj. P = 0.018) than nonHFSs. Respondents with better knowledge responses also had better frailty practices (40.3% vs. 3.6%, adj. P < 0.001). Conclusion: Distinct response differences suggest that future strategies strengthening frailty principles should address practices peculiar to subspecialties, such as pre-procedural frailty strategies for interventionists and rehabilitation interventions for HFSs. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179867 | ISSN: | 2752-4191 | DOI: | 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae025 | Schools: | Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) | Rights: | © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | LKCMedicine Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
oeae025.pdf | 863.38 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Page view(s)
71
Updated on Mar 11, 2025
Download(s)
15
Updated on Mar 11, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.