Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/184289
Title: Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement
Authors: Vickers, Peter
Adamo, Ludovica
Alfano, Mark
Clark, Cory
Cresto, Eleonora
Cui, He
Dang, Haixin
Dellsén, Finnur
Dupin, Nathalie
Gradowski, Laura
Graf, Simon
Guevara, Aline
Hallap, Mark
Hamilton, Jesse
Hardey, Mariann
Helm, Paula
Landrum, Asheley
Levy, Neil
Machery, Edouard
Mills, Sarah
Muller, Seán
Sheppard, Joanne
N. K. Shinod
Slater, Matthew
Stegenga, Jacob
Strandin, Henning
Stuart, Michael T.
Sweet, David
Tasdan, Ufuk
Taylor, Henry
Towler, Owen
Tulodziecki, Dana
Tworek, Heidi
Wallbank, Rebecca
Wiltsche, Harald
Finnigan, Samantha Mitchell
Keywords: Arts and Humanities
Issue Date: 2024
Source: Vickers, P., Adamo, L., Alfano, M., Clark, C., Cresto, E., Cui, H., Dang, H., Dellsén, F., Dupin, N., Gradowski, L., Graf, S., Guevara, A., Hallap, M., Hamilton, J., Hardey, M., Helm, P., Landrum, A., Levy, N., Machery, E., ...Finnigan, S. M. (2024). Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement. PloS One, 19(12), e0313541-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313541
Journal: PloS One 
Abstract: We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world's scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a '10 second survey', where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/184289
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313541
Schools: School of Humanities 
Rights: © 2024 Vickers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SoH Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0313541.pdf2.7 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
Updated on May 2, 2025

Page view(s)

16
Updated on May 7, 2025

Download(s)

1
Updated on May 7, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.