Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/35487
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHeng, Jeremy Jun Jie.-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Belinda Kah Siew.-
dc.contributor.authorTay, Jieying.-
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-19T07:49:35Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-19T07:49:35Z-
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/35487-
dc.description.abstractPricing is one of the most important marketing decisions that carry major financial consequences. Langabeer (1988) proposes that there are two major perspectives in pricing, namely, perceived value and cost-based pricing. Although many researchers have offered similar classifications of pricing strategies, current academic research on the impact of how these pricing strategies affect firm performance are few and far between. To bridge the research gap, our study seeks to examine how the use of perceived value pricing and cost-based pricing, and their interaction effects will affect firm performance. Our results suggest that cost-based pricing alone has no significant effect of firm performance, whereas perceived value pricing results in positive improvements in firm performance. More importantly, the combined use of both cost-based pricing and perceived value pricing lead to better firm performance than the sole use of either pricing strategy. Given that the dual use of cost-based pricing and perceived value pricing leads to superior performance outcomes, we also explore how certain managerial orientations (namely, company, customer and competitor orientations) and behavioral predispositions (namely, risk aversion, perceived environment hostility and long-term outlook) drive the adoption of either pricing strategy. Our findings show that these factors are important antecedents of both cost-based and perceived value pricing strategies. Specifically, managers who possess a high customer orientation, high company orientation, low competitor orientation, low perceived environment hostility, and who are more risk-averse and short-term focused are more likely to adopt the two pricing strategies. We discuss the managerial implications of these findings.en_US
dc.format.extent45 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University-
dc.subjectDRNTU::Business::Marketing::Pricingen_US
dc.titleExploring the complementary effects of perceived value and cost-based pricing strategies on firm performance.en_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorLim Kui Suen, Lewisen_US
dc.contributor.schoolCollege of Business (Nanyang Business School)en_US
dc.description.degreeBUSINESSen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
Appears in Collections:NBS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
b4714.pdf
  Restricted Access
477.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 50

293
checked on Oct 23, 2020

Download(s) 50

6
checked on Oct 23, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.