Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||人生似幻化,终当归空无 ：《桃花源记》与《桃花源诗》之比较 = Comparison between “Tao Hua Yuan Ji” and “Tao Hua Yuan Shi”||Authors:||潘汉威 Poon, Han Wei||Keywords:||DRNTU::Humanities::Literature::Chinese||Issue Date:||2011||Abstract:||“桃花源”从古至今都是人们的理想境地。那里的人与自然同生息，过着无拘无束的纯朴生活。经过陶渊明的幻想与创作，后人得以通过两个不同的版本，即《桃花源记》和《桃花源诗》，认识“桃花源”。《桃花源记》和《桃花源诗》，属于两个不同的文体，即散文和诗。两篇作品都记述了同一个内容：桃花源的故事。除了字数与形式各异，《桃花源诗》与《桃花源记》在内容的呈现上，如主题内容的分布、叙事顺序、字词句的选择等，都能发现许多不同之处。就因两篇作品在形式与内容上有许多不同，读者从文本中接收到的信息就会有很大的差别。Throughout history, “Peach Blossom Spring” (Tao Hua Yuan) has been the ideal place to be for many. Being in sync with nature, the residents of this utopia lead a carefree and simple life. With imagination, Tao Yuanming invited readers to explore this utopia through two of his writings, “An Account of the Peach Blossom Spring” (Tao Hua Yuan Ji) and “A Poem about the Peach Blossom Spring” (Tao Hua Yuan Shi). Even though “Tao Hua Yuan Ji” and “Tao Hua Yuan Shi” belongs to two different genres, one being an account and the other a poem, they explore the same content, the story of “Peach Blossom Spring”. Besides being different in the word count and its form, the two writings differ much in the presentation of its contents; namely, the distribution and proportion of its contents, the order of narration, main themes, language use and rhetoric. Readers receive contrasting messages from the texts as a result of these differences.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10356/43651||Rights:||Nanyang Technological University||Fulltext Permission:||restricted||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.