Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The (post)modern debate in chuck palahniuk’s survivor, choke and pygmy.
Authors: Kaur, Gurveen.
Keywords: DRNTU::Humanities::Literature::American
Issue Date: 2011
Abstract: This paper examines three of Chuck Palahniuk's novels—Survivor, Choke and Pygmy within both a modern and postmodern frame. Being a contemporary American writer, Palahniuk's work have been most commonly classified to be postmodern. His commentary on the effects of postmodern society on individuals in his writing has deemed his fiction to be regarded as existentialist, transgressive, and most commonly, nihilist. However, this essay proposes that there are elements of modernism in his texts as well. The modernist and postmodernist literary periods shall be examined and extricated such that the general understanding of the terms remain yet there is a specificity to their more distinctive traits when used in reference to Survivor, Choke and Pygmy. Though the novels do share certain similarities in form and overlying themes, each presents varying instances of the modernist or postmodernist literary style. In doing so, not only will this essay hope to gain a wider comprehension on the workings of each novel through their form and content but also uncover the tensions that arise when dissecting them as postmodern and/or modern texts. In this process, perhaps a better understanding of the similarities and differences between the two literary periods will be attained as well.
Rights: Nanyang Technological University
Fulltext Permission: restricted
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gurveen Kaur FYP 2011.docx
  Restricted Access
165.7 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open

Page view(s)

checked on Sep 28, 2020


checked on Sep 28, 2020

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.