Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/44792
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAng, Eunice Li Jun
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kelly Cher Wei
dc.contributor.authorKong, Melissa Sze Min
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-06T01:04:22Z
dc.date.available2011-06-06T01:04:22Z
dc.date.copyright2011en_US
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/44792
dc.description.abstractThis paper seeks to analyse the ability of different pension systems to cope with the pressures of population aging. We chose 2 distinct pension systems: Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s pension system where one is mainly self-funded while the other is financed by a pay-as-you-go structure. To ensure that both systems are compared on a similar platform, we compared them with the World Bank’s 5 Pillar Model. This model was devised by the World Bank to evaluate the feasibility of different pension systems. In this model, pension systems have to fulfil 6 criterions: Sustainability, Adequacy, Affordability, Predictability, Robustness and Equitability. To investigate the ability of these 2 pension systems to provide for their people, we came up with 3 fictitious characters, each belonging to different income groups. We compared the payments to each pension scheme and the benefits received upon retirement. We also included supporting evidences such as replacement ratio and breakeven age to consider the financial burden on the state. Through our results, we discovered that the Singapore’s model is more pragmatic as compared to the Danish model which provides generous payouts to their retirees. However, the generous payouts to retirees in Denmark come at the price of higher income tax rates. Each pension system has its weaknesses in different areas which are improved through complementary policies. Hence, we conclude that there is no one perfect pension model that is suitable for every country and that a comprehensive pension system can adopt different structures, as long as they serve the needs of its people.en_US
dc.format.extent45 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Economic theoryen_US
dc.titleComparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar modelen_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorChew Soon Bengen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Artsen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
Appears in Collections:HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
H35.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

524
Updated on Feb 27, 2021

Download(s) 50

38
Updated on Feb 27, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.